On Oct 26, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Schuh, Richard wrote:
That's the way IBM delivers it :-)
In
the case of OPERATOR, watch out for OPERATIONS authority -
some people naiively give OPERATOR too much authority.
Do you leave its password set to OPERATOR too? I mean, after all,
that's the way IBM
On my very very last day at work at Sine Nomine, guess what I finally
got, courtesy of David and Margarete?
That's right. A pony.
Actually, quite a few ponies.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/17339...@n00/3996384848/
I'll attach it too, but I think that will get stripped--so use the
flickr
On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Wakser, David wrote:
Adam:
Please explain, for those of us not yet involved in Linux, why
it's not cost effective. For example, if we already have z/VM running,
there is no additional cost involved.
David Wakser
Maybe I'm undercaffeinated. Since it's in
Some of you know this already, and some of you don't:
Last month, I was offered a great opportunity at another organization
that will allow me to focus my career in a way I have been interested
in for quite a while. I accepted that position, knowing that my
customers at SNA would be in
On Oct 1, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Schuh, Richard wrote:
After several hours, but before a dump could be taken,
Tried metamucil?
Adam
On Sep 18, 2009, at 9:11 AM, David Boyes wrote:
I think we're all in violent agreement on that point. Now, the
question is
what is the best way to put a safety on that gun?
Oooh! Oooh! Pick me! Mandatory User Access Control dialog boxes
that pop up and make you click OK any time you
On Sep 17, 2009, at 1:58 PM, Bill Holder wrote:
I'd agree with that point in cases where it's less clear, but in
this case, it's perfectly clear that the user action would have
been harmless if not for the administrator typo
Yabbut
Administrator typo is not a failure mode the operating
On Sep 17, 2009, at 5:36 PM, David Boyes wrote:
Whether it should march off a cliff without at least questioning the
order
is the question at hand.
Of course it should.
Yes, my Unix is showing.
Adam
On Sep 2, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
I don't recommend going into production with any system that has
default
dasd labels or passwords. But that's just me.
Passwords I can see.
But changing DASD labels? How come? If it's security-through-
obscurity, then it's not very
On Sep 2, 2009, at 1:35 PM, David Boyes wrote:
I think my list of “must-haves” would be:
VMARC
the PIPE-friendly DDR
TRACK
plastic pipes
XCOL
CHARLOTT
*I* really like CUA2001, but, uh, that's just my perversity.
Adam
On Sep 2, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Schuh, Richard wrote:
I think it goes more to separating production from installation/
maintenance. It the volsers are different, changing something on the
system must be deliberate. Accidental update is very difficult. Alan
is big on data integrity, well ... as
On Aug 14, 2009, at 11:42 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
IPL 190 PARM NOSPROF INSTSEG NO
Who am I? :-)
With that line, most likely Chucky.
Adam
On Jul 29, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Edward M Martin wrote:
Hello Adam,
I can say that I was told, in no uncertain terms, from IBM
that it is illegal to run VM/ESA and up under Hercules.
That was a while back, and things may have changed but I have
never
seen anything to the contrary.
On Jul 29, 2009, at 1:50 AM, Dave Wade wrote:
I seem to recall it being mentioned somewhere that after the PSI
debacle IBM
amended the license terms to specifically prohibit the use of zVM
under
Emulation of any kind thus closing this loophole.
Even if it's on the same processor? That
On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Edward M Martin wrote:
I can say that, 1) it is illegal to run z/VM (pick a version)
under Hercules, 2) they do not like it, and 3) they do not have any
sense of humor.
Perfectly fine to run it under Hercules on the processor z/VM is
licensed to.
Adam
On Jul 28, 2009, at 6:32 PM, John McKown wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Adam Thornton wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Edward M Martin wrote:
I can say that, 1) it is illegal to run z/VM (pick a version)
under Hercules, 2) they do not like it, and 3) they do not have any
sense
On Jul 13, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Thomas Kern wrote:
Many years ago, IBM had a package, I think it was called REXX/CUA. I
am
not in the office today or I could give you the product number. We
wrote
several menued execs using it. I don't remember the price, if there
was
a price. It was ALL in
On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:15 AM, David Boyes wrote:
Simple answer: put a Linux guest in front of the VM TCP stack with
the old address as the external address, renumber the VM stack to a
RFC1918 address on an internal guest lan, and enable IP Masquerade
in iptables. That gets you all sorts of
On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:15 AM, David Boyes wrote:
Simple answer: put a Linux guest in front of the VM TCP stack with
the old address as the external address, renumber the VM stack to a
RFC1918 address on an internal guest lan, and enable IP Masquerade
in iptables. That gets you all sorts of
On Jul 8, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Jim Bohnsack wrote:
Easy for you to say.
How about She sells sea shells by the seashore?
Adam
On Jul 1, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Richard Troth wrote:
By the way ... Unix cheats.
The shell expands all wildcards, which I have always said is a mistake
because it presumes on the context. The shell can only expand
wildcards that are filenames. Not everything you might want to
wildcard is a file.
On Jun 5, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Stephen Frazier wrote:
Some people who have tried 3420's on z/VM 5.3 said they work.
However IBM is no longer testing 3420 code and if it ever stops
working they may not fix it.
Finding the actual 3420 hardware that still works is getting
difficult. :)
On Jun 4, 2009, at 9:21 AM, Edward M Martin wrote:
Typically Maint has 540RES as 123 MR.
I should not answer questions before coffee.
Yeah, there already *IS* a covering minidisk, isn't there?
Question: is it actually safe to DDR the RES volume from a live system
to another system? I
On Jun 4, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote:
I’m attempting to clone our pilot VM system to a production lpar
since it looks like a couple of applications might actually have a
real future (a quiet hurray!). Attempting to copy the res volumes
fails
q 127a
DASD 127A CP
On Jun 3, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Robert J McCarthy wrote:
I am trying to develop a shutdown procedure to cleanly shutdown my
linux guests, prior to shutting down vm. Reading the documentation
in the virtualization cookbook for SLES10 and the vm CP COMMANDS
manual; I have setup the following :
On Jun 2, 2009, at 11:51 AM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
A lot of it also depends on local practices.
1. Backupsscheduled..and monitored.
And RESTORED, whether you need to or not, on some schedule. A good
test, I'd say, is to pick ten files at random from the backup
catalogue every so
On Jun 2, 2009, at 7:57 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Yes, just having some fun!
It's not Friday, so fun is not permitted here.
Move along.
Adam
On May 29, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
I really must get cracking on the z/VM Auditor's Field and Survival
Guide [Free cudgel included at no extra charge! Now contains the most
common phrases heard from z/VM security weasels in the wild, including
such hits as I'm gonna whap you
On May 15, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Miguel Delapaz wrote:
Adam,
What does NETSTAT DEV say?
Well, *IT* says that my interface there is not working, and TCPIP
startup bears this out:
Device ETH1Type: OSDStatus: Inactive
Queue size: 0 CPU: 0 Address: 7008
On May 15, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Miguel Delapaz wrote:
Adam,
Transport Type: IP
This says your NIC is defined as Layer 3.
14:55:58 DTCOSD355E OSD device ETH1: Possible LAN transport
misconfiguration detected during OSD device initialization.
This says you tried to attach a Layer 3 NIC to
On May 15, 2009, at 3:22 PM, O'Brien, Dennis L wrote:
Adam,
You don’t specify layer 2 or 3 on the NICDEF. You specify it on
your DEFINE LAN or DEFINE VSWITCH statement.
Yeah, but I DID that:
Here's the L3 LAN:
LAN SYSTEM GLAN1Type: QDIOConnected: 1Maxconn: INFINITE
On May 15, 2009, at 3:24 PM, Miguel Delapaz wrote:
I defined it to TCPIP with DIRM NICDEF and I don't see any way
to specify whether I mean Layer 2 or Layer 3. I just defined it
as QDIO.
I think my cough syrup is failing me. How do I tell DIRMAINT, no,
really, QDIO *ETHERNET* ?
On May 15, 2009, at 3:36 PM, David Kreuter wrote:
Why are you picking on poor ole DIRMAINT? It's CP that doesn't support
it in the NICDEF statement! not DIRMAINT -
OK, so, look, surely I'm not the first person to want to do this.
How do I couple a virtual machine's virtual NIC to a Layer 2
On May 15, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Miguel Delapaz wrote:
OK, so, look, surely I'm not the first person to want to do this.
With the ETHERNET option on the QDIOETHERNET LINK statement (in case
you missed my other note)
Yay! Thank you! (Your other note hadn't arrived quite yet.)
I now have
On May 14, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
I wonder if anyone is attaching a LTO4 (Linear Tape Open,
Generation 4),
via FCP, to a z9 or z10 running zVM 5.4?
Yes, to SLES 10 SP 2 on both a z9 and z10 under zVM 5.4, via NPIV to
I10K SAN switch.
And if yes, are there any zVM utilities
On May 3, 2009, at 3:39 AM, Malcolm Beattie wrote:
David Boyes writes:
On 5/1/09 4:20 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Morituri te Salutant! :-)
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori, sed dulcius pro patria
vivere, et
dulcissimum pro patria bibere. Ergo, bibamus pro
On Apr 26, 2009, at 9:44 PM, Martin, Terry R. (LOCKHEED MARTIN
Performance Engineering/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Hi
I am using SWAPGEN to define by z/Linux VDISKS I also want to define
a real disk for swap. My question is can I use SWAPGEN to define a
swap on real DASD? If you have an example
On Apr 4, 2009, at 11:19 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Saturday, 04/04/2009 at 12:10 EDT, Chip Davis c...@aresti.com
wrote:
On 4/3/09 17:29 Alan Altmark said:
It was a tupo.
Wow, that's impressive!
tupo by itself is a 'meta-typo' but coupled with its reference to
two
releases
of z/VM,
On Apr 3, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Raymond Noal wrote:
I would like to thank all of you who responded. I was really
surprised at how the majority of you made the leap from using PEEK
to TCPIP data buffers.
Well, it's highly intuitive, after all.
Adam
On Apr 2, 2009, at 9:15 AM, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Greg_Dyrda?= wrote:
We currently bill for Linux on a per guest basis. I'm wondering what
approach others are taking. Specifically, I'm wondering if it is
possibl
e
to bill at the process level and if anyone else is billing that way.
If you want
If you have h3270 pointing at a recent s3270, then you can get SSL
support for free by specifying:
L:hostname:portnum instead of just hostname in the connect to field.
Other Phun Phact: you're probably going to have to edit your Tomcat
(or whatever) policy to allow the h3270 program to
On Mar 19, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Thursday, 03/19/2009 at 08:39 EDT, Mrohs, Ray ray.mr...@usdoj.gov
wrote:
Thanks Alan. Unfortunately our site is standardized on the Rumba
client,
and the centrally managed upgrades happen once a blue moon. It looks
like it might be a
On Mar 18, 2009, at 3:10 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
Bad idea to throw them away. But I would be happy with a summary
chapter in the book that has the scenario for those who are not
completely new to z/VM installation.
It strikes me that, given that we have several versions' worth of
On Mar 18, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
Checklists and other preparatory advice, based on real-world
experience,
are ponies of a different color. They would definitely be a value-
add,
providing *guidance* (opinion) where IBM can usually only provide a
*procedure*.
Hey, man,
On Mar 17, 2009, at 5:56 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
Are you sure the disk is R/W and that it is the right size? I
tried to do it from the quick ref guide and found that it was
missing some of the steps that you need (and are only in the real
book).
You mean the missing 22cc and 2cf1
On Mar 17, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
It really does not have to be in MAINT - you don't want to run the 2nd
level system in MAINT anyway, so why mess with things. It's also only
needed briefly in the process, so for me 3 T-disks would be fine. And
in theory when you ship the GA
I just installed a virgin z/VM 5.4 with all products on filepool
rather than on minidisk.
I only tweaked it enough to get a TCPIP stack up and running so that I
could FTP the RSU over to it, DETERSE it, and apply service. I've
done literally nothing else to the system.
0 * * * Top
On Mar 17, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Neale Ferguson wrote:
The component is cpsfs or cmssfs ... Not cp or cms which are for
minidisks.
I just tried to run SERVICE ALL RPTF0168
Which, you know, *should* be able to figure it out. It has in the past.
Adam
On Mar 17, 2009, at 2:53 PM, O'Brien, Dennis L wrote:
Adam,
It looks like SERVICE is trying to service LE instead of LESFS. There
are a couple of items in the PSP bucket that have to do with SFS, but
the descriptions aren't an exact match for this problem. Did you read
all of the ZVM540
On Mar 17, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Tuesday, 03/17/2009 at 04:11 EDT, Adam Thornton
athorn...@sinenomine.net wrote:
All I did was download the RSU and then follow the Service
Procedure
paragraph on the Quick Install Guide.
Because there's only so much you can put on one
On Mar 13, 2009, at 10:54 AM, Martin, Terry R. (LOCKHEED MARTIN
Performance Engineering/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Rob,
I am setting these disks up using SWAPGEN. I am adding enough to
total about 4G(This is about what my paging subsystem will handle).
This is the test that we spoke of!
SWAPGEN
On Mar 13, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Martin, Terry R. (LOCKHEED MARTIN
Performance Engineering/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Hi Adam,
What is the format of the SWAPGEN command if you use it in the
directory I currently issue SWAPGEN in the PROFILE of the z/Linux
guest.
You use SWAPGEN in PROFILE.
It's just
On Mar 13, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Rich Smrcina wrote:
I was one of the users that requested this.
The advantage is that the size of the VDISKs are then controlled by
the directory entry. You don't need to have special handling in the
PROFILE EXEC for each virtual machine if a different size is
On Feb 28, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Rick Troth wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Jim Bohnsack wrote:
There should be a SHARE Economic Stimulus Plan for the poor
companies
(and universities) who are cutting their budgets. I live just
north of
Dallas (Plano) and offered to pay my own transportation,
On Feb 25, 2009, at 2:58 PM, Raymond Noal wrote:
Dear list,
Does anyone know what this system abend code is – VAI008?
The CP Codes manual only says that the abend code is issued by
module HCPVAI and that this module is object code only with no
source available. The codes manual makes no
On Feb 17, 2009, at 4:21 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Tuesday, 02/17/2009 at 01:41 EST, clifford jackson
cliffordjackson...@msn.com wrote:
I am in the process of building a SSLSERV virtual machine, under z/VM
5.3 SLU
801, using SLES 9 SP3. ONE question is there a Red book for this
process?..
On Jan 21, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Dean, David (I/S) wrote:
We have a virtual zLinux SUSE 10.1 file server on zVM 5.2 that
currently supplies over 600 Gigs of DASD (SAMBA 3 file storage) to
end users. Is there a point (technical or logical) when we should
build a second server rather than
On Jan 14, 2009, at 10:43 AM, David Boyes wrote:
This is also why Sun stopped using real addresses in their
documentation
examples. Too many people actually set their systems up to run using
Sun's
actual address space and when they connected to the public Internet,
Extremely Weird Things
On Dec 31, 2008, at 4:34 PM, David Boyes wrote:
Interesting new attack on SSL-based security - compromise the CA
infrastructure.
Amazing that CAs still use MD5. I would have expected Thawte, anyway,
to know better.
Adam
On Dec 18, 2008, at 8:51 AM, David Boyes wrote:
On 12/17/08 9:09 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Thank you for running the test. As Garth Brooks says, Thank God for
unanswered prayers. :-)
Chuckie listens to *country*?
Much becomes clearer. 8-) Do they have both kinds of
On Dec 4, 2008, at 7:32 PM, Marcy Cortes wrote:
Personally, I'd like that product to work hand-in-hand with our
existing VM:Backup product which we z/VM'ers control on our own.
(Anyone at CA listening)
Yes, what he said!
If anyone on the list is interested in building a solution
On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Another limitation is that WEBSHARE does not support SSL, just plain
HTTP. The RSK-based one from IBM doesn't either.
Yeah, but it'd be trivial to wrap it in SSLSERV. It's a well-behaved
protocol, not like FTP.
Adam
On Nov 25, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
2) they must change as CP changes. [free advice: changes are a-
comin',
rollin' 'round the bend.]
Should we be using Folsom Prison Blues or Dylan's Slow Train as
our model?
Adam
On Nov 25, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Alan Altmark wrote:
Oh, z/OS! z/OS! Another drink, if you please. Be sure to put an
umbrella in it. A blue one. No no, not sky blue, but one of azure.
You're such a dear. Now go on and play - I'll call again if I need
you.
This is disturbing for very many
On Nov 17, 2008, at 10:32 PM, David Boyes wrote:
You can try. 8-) The code up to and including the 5.3 release won't
go much
over 192, even with current service. We have a version of the SSL
Enabler
appliance that reflects the latest IBM code if you want to try it.
Note: latest == latest
On Nov 13, 2008, at 7:53 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
Anyone have any tools for converting C header (H) files to COBOL
copybook files? Or experience doing so?
Does a bottle of Scotch and another bottle of aspirin count as a tool?
(MicroFocus COBOL for Unix had a tool to do this: H2cpy)
Adam
On Nov 7, 2008, at 4:30 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Hi
I am trying to use the SWAPGEN EXEC to create a FBA SWAP file by
adding it to the PROFILE EXEC of the Linux guest. However it seems
to keep taking the default of DIAG. Since I do not have the DIAG
drivers on my
On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:19 AM, Steve Mitchell wrote:
The puzzle: Why did the SSH process fail? I'm not certain where to
look
for an explanation. I've checked the Velocity reports, VM was
doing some
paging during both of these times, could that have done it? CPU
consumption was not
On Oct 30, 2008, at 10:44 AM, Schuh, Richard wrote:
I would like to see how that would be implemented, the die and come
back
part, without some external agent being involved.
This is getting way too theological for me.
Adam
On Oct 29, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
SFS has been around for 21 years
No! That's impossible! Why, that would mean that I'moh, dear.
Adam
On Oct 28, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
1. As has been said, you don't need a R/W disk to IPL. R/O is
good. SFS directory is even better.
2. Once you IPL Linux, you are not in CMS anymore. You won't be
doing anything with your a-disk anymore. So make it easy on your
self,
On Oct 28, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
I must of missed the first part of the conversation
Why would you want Linux to have access to your A-disk?
There might be reasons, but inquiring minds want to know, and
deleted the original posts G.
Handy for building systems where you
On Oct 24, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Dave Jones wrote:
Found over on the IBM-MAIN list.looks interesting:
http://www.mochasoft.dk/iphone_tn3270.htm
David's already using it. He says it's pretty good.
Me, I'm getting a G1. I crushed my MDA when I fell on it, and T-
Mobile has been OK so far.
On Oct 24, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Michael Coffin wrote:
Hi Folks,
Does anyone know if there is a Redbook, Whitepaper or other good
reading for deploying SSL on z/VM for the first time?
I'm trying to follow the instructions in the TCP/IP Planning Guide,
but I have to confess as a first-timer
On Oct 22, 2008, at 3:04 PM, David Boyes wrote:
times earlier, if you want JAVA support on VM, you should install
a
Linux guest and use the up-to-date levels on there.
Java itself is a virtual machine. Maybe a z/Java guest someday?
Would be a clever way to actually make the zAAP specialty
On Sep 30, 2008, at 1:13 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
As a matter of fact that is one of the commonalties of these hosts.
There is Oracle Clustering going on in these hosts. Can you explain
more about this?
Well, I don't know exactly how Oracle does it.
But I do know,
On Sep 29, 2008, at 3:54 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Hi
Over the last month or so we have had CHECK SUM ERRORS on 3 of our z/
Linux hosts. This error stops the Linux host from coming back up
after a re-boot or log off. After working with REDHAT they found
that there was 2
On Sep 14, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Hi
I am having a little problem maybe you can see what I am doing wrong!
I defined the mdisk starting at 38 ending at 159 for my parmfile:
q v 195
DASD 0195 3390 53DRES R/W159 CYL ON DASD 514B SUBCHANNEL =
000E
On Sep 1, 2008, at 7:04 PM, David Kreuter wrote:
HMC worksheet? Who fills that in? What's wrong with a napkin?
This one has mustard on it.
At least, I *hope* it's mustard.
Adam
On Aug 28, 2008, at 10:54 AM, Duane Weaver wrote:
Well here is the scoop. We acting as a DR site for another
university. The other university wants to bring in their zVM 5.3 and
run it under our zVM 5.2 system.
Our z800 is running in basic mode with 1 lpar, running the zVM 5.2.
Shouldn't
On Aug 28, 2008, at 8:07 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
The Court of Opinion and Assizes is now in Session.
Recall that we have two one-sheet (two pages, front back) tri-fold
installation summary cards: one for tape and one for DVD (1st and 2nd
level).
The questions:
1. Do these cards have value?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 08:19:22PM -0400, David Boyes wrote:
If you truly still need 370 mode, you're going to be hard pressed to find a
system that will still run true 370 mode. Most (if not all) the modern
systems no longer have true 370 mode microcode.
Howeveron a modern z9 you can
On Aug 19, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Fran Hensler wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:21:40 -0400 Jiri Stehlik said:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/descript.cgi?DRPC
The FTPPUT and FTPGET PIPE stages were also included and documented
at the
above address.
I have the latest CMS PIPLINES but it
On Aug 19, 2008, at 1:48 PM, David Boyes wrote:
Well, far be it from me that I suggest that VM Development begin to
talk
to themselves. You lot 're odd enough to begin with...8-)
As Zork so eloquently put it, Talking to yourself is said to be a
sign of impending mental collapse.
Adam
On Aug 19, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Fran Hensler wrote:
On Aug 19, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Fran Hensler wrote:
I have the latest CMS PIPLINES but it doesn't include FTPGET and
FTPPUT. I can't find them on the IBM Download site either.
Where can I get them?
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:48:20 -0500 Adam
On Aug 15, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Rich Greenberg wrote:
On: Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:03:14PM -0500,Adam Thornton Wrote:
} On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:34 PM, Paul Raulerson wrote:
}
} (1) Learn vi.
}
} Heretic.
Adam may call me a heretic also but I agree with Paul. While there
are
many other editors
On Aug 14, 2008, at 7:08 PM, Thomas Kern wrote:
When CMS HELP first came out, the group I was with built a process
to format and print all of the Help files into our own books. It
would be nice if there was a process to format and print all of the
MAN pages that are resident on an
On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:34 PM, Paul Raulerson wrote:
(1) Learn vi.
Heretic.
Adam
On Aug 12, 2008, at 11:47 AM, Stephen Frazier wrote:
Two questions that anyone who is new enough to need your reminder
will ask are:
What default do you suggest?
When changing it, how should it be changed?
The old timers here will know the answers.
*I* suggest using the /dev/disk/by-path
On Aug 12, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Thomas Kern wrote:
I have been using /dev/dasd?1 where ? goes from a to zz.
Is by-path the /dev/disk/0.0.0591 syntax?
Yeah, although it's more like /dev/disk/by-path/ccw-0.0.0591-part1
these days.
Ada,
On Aug 12, 2008, at 4:31 PM, David Boyes wrote:
I would just like to point out that Alan Altmark’s long-standing
wish for a pony has been satisfied. A brown and white pony has been
delivered, and he has no need for further ponies. 8-)
Uh oh.
See, it wasn't Alan who wanted the pony.
It
On Aug 7, 2008, at 4:28 AM, Berry van Sleeuwen wrote:
Hello List,
The past day I have tried to get the new version of SWAPGEN into my
VM but
no success so far. I have tried every way I can do a filetransfer but
every time I end up in a file I can't use on VM. Can anyone send me
the
On Aug 6, 2008, at 7:37 AM, Tim Joyce wrote:
Hey guys,
I've been using secure telnet through a SSLSERV for many months now.
After we IPLed over the weekend, it stopped working. The SSLSERV
machine is up a communicating with SSLADMIN commands. The
certificate looks correct. NETSTAT CO
On Aug 6, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Tim Joyce wrote:
Hey Adam,
Thanks for the reply. Here is my DF command:
df
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/dasda1 139368127316 12052 92% /
tmpfs63040 0 63040 0% /dev/shm
On Jul 31, 2008, at 5:08 PM, Gary M. Dennis wrote:
z/VOS translates guest OS code during initial execution. Code fragment
storage, lookup, disposal and reuse for primary and sibling guests are
addressed in a patent application. Suffice it to say that we don't
interpret or emulate massive
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Alan Altmark
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And while I'm halucinating, I would have a command that adds and
deletes
users from an autolog list. The list is in the warm start area. No
requirement for AUTOLOG1
On Jul 28, 2008, at 2:43 PM, Schuh, Richard wrote:
No. Redefining virtual memory causes a virtual system reset. It
takes an IPl after that. You can update the directory to allow
additional, but you cannot redefine the virtual storage of a
running machine without causing the reset.
On Jul 25, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
Resist the idea to use VMSYS* filepools for other purposes. Any time
saved by hijacking the VMSERVU configuration to hold your own data is
normally paid back later at a less convenient moment.
I consider myself more than usually tolerant of
On Jul 25, 2008, at 8:48 AM, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary M. Dennis
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 9:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Nice idea in blog: Should we toss x86 architecture
On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Schuh, Richard wrote:
It doesn't seem that difficult, just follow the instructions. It may
be
drudgery, but the cookbook does work ;-)
OK. Compare to adding more storage to ZFS or adding more storage
to a Linux LVM2 volume.
Sure, I'm not having to manually
1 - 100 of 314 matches
Mail list logo
