On our z9 BC we had to give 1G out of the 8G we paid for.
Dave Lewis
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2007 12:58 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: zVM 4.4 on a z9
...
What is
I suppose I should complain to IBM, but I was wondering if anyone else
had seen this. The short description is that when I used the SERVICE and
PUT2PROD execs to apply the service for PTF UM31957 on user 5VMPTK20 the
FCONX $PROFILE on 1CC got replaced.
It took me awhile to figure out why VMCF and
At 5.2 the active disks are:
cms q disk
LABEL VDEV M STAT CYL TYPE BLKSZ FILES BLKS USED-(%) BLKS LEFT
BLK TOT
FCN191 191 A R/W60 3390 4096 12 1997-18 8801
108
FCX201 201 B R/O10 3390 40969 1212-67588
18
FCX1CC 1CC D R/O 1
There are a ton of PTFs needed to get VSE 2.6 to run on a z9.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Allen
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 1:21 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: VSE hard wait under z/VM 4.3
We moved
With today's DASD the only way to ensure that the data is gone is to write
garbage to cylinder after cylinder, volume after volume, until the device can
no longer store anymore data.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
