Re: 3590J to 3590H

2007-01-19 Thread Mark Pace
LONG STORY- but I won't bore everyone with it. 4 days later and the new 3590s are running. Had specialist tell me I needed to mark all my migration/backup volumes as full. Also to set readcompatability in the Attributes section of RMM. So I wanted to re-int, label, a tape to see if it writes

Re: 3590J to 3590H

2007-01-19 Thread Macioce, Larry
// From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Imler, Steven J Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 9:04 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: 3590J to 3590H It's not for 3590s

Re: 3590J to 3590H

2007-01-19 Thread Mark Pace
Thanks! Worked perfectly. On 1/19/07, Macioce, Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is the jcl to init tapes..good luck..Mace -- Mark Pace Mainline Information Systems

3590J to 3590H

2007-01-08 Thread Mark Pace
We are about to replace out 3590-J tape drives with 3590-H models. I am curious as to how to convert to using the deeper density of the 3590-H on our existing tapes. I'm guessing that it is simply re-initializing our scratch tapes with the new drives. As for the tapes that a currently in use,

Re: 3590J to 3590H

2007-01-08 Thread Mark Pace
I should clarify this a little better. We are moving from 3590-B1A drives to 3590-H1A drives. The tapes are the J length. On 1/8/07, Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are about to replace out 3590-J tape drives with 3590-H models. I am curious as to how to convert to using the deeper

Re: 3590J to 3590H

2007-01-08 Thread Imler, Steven J
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:09 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: 3590J to 3590H I should clarify this a little better. We are moving from 3590-B1A drives to 3590-H1A drives. The tapes are the J length. On 1/8/07, Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We are about