2009 10:16 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CP Message HCP401I
Are the e-mails sent to users on the same VM system? If so, the automation may
be contributing to SPOOL utilization. Sort of as a publication index
containing: Loop -- see "Loop".
In that case send the e-mai
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: CP Message HCP401I
>
> Are the e-mails sent to users on the same VM system? If so,
> the automation may be contributing to SPOOL utilization.
> Sort of as a publication index containing: Loop -- see "Loop".
>
>
Associates
(Sent from the wee keyboard on a Blackberry.)
- Original Message -
From: "Wandschneider, Scott" [scott.wandschnei...@infocrossing.com]
Sent: 10/30/2009 08:05 AM MST
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CP Message HCP401I
I created a REXX EXEC that checks pre-defi
30, 2009 9:30 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CP Message HCP401I
I used to work with a guy who put together code that does what you're
talking about using VMSCHED with WAKEUP. It monitored spool
utilization, including rate of change of spool utilization. I think at
each snapsh
to put it together.
Jim
Wandschneider, Scott wrote:
Another good suggestion - Thank you.
Thank you,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Tracy Dean
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:20 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.ED
Another good suggestion - Thank you.
Thank you,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Tracy Dean
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:20 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CP Message HCP401I
Since Mike opened
Thank you for the suggestion.
Thank you,
Scott
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Michael Harding
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 5:28 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CP Message HCP401I
On the other hand, if you have
I have not looked, but if you are a stubborn SOB like me and wish to change
VM's behaviour, create a localmod.
-Original Message-
>From: Alan Altmark
>Sent: Oct 29, 2009 5:05 PM
>To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>Subject: Re: CP Message HCP401I
>
>On Thursday,
Since Mike opened the door to mentioning products that can help in this
space, let me add IBM Operations Manager for z/VM.
It allows you to monitor spool space and set different triggers at
different % full "ranges". I.e. at 50%-75% full, send a message to
OPERATOR, at 75%-85% full, send so
09
03:19:02 PM:
> From: "Wandschneider, Scott"
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Date: 10/29/2009 03:20 PM
> Subject: Re: CP Message HCP401I
> Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
>
> Thank you!
>
> Thank you,
>
> Scott
>
>
> -Orig
Thank you!
Thank you,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 5:06 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CP Message HCP401I
On Thursday, 10/29/2009 at 05:47 EDT
On Thursday, 10/29/2009 at 05:47 EDT, "Wandschneider, Scott"
wrote:
> This message is displayed if the page|spool area reaches 90%. Can the
value of
> 90 be changed?
No.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
This message is displayed if the page|spool area reaches 90%. Can the value of
90 be changed?
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer|| Infocrossing, a Wipro Company || 11707 Miracle
Hills Drive, Omaha, NE, 68154-4457|| : 402.963.8905 || :847.849.7223 || :
scott.wandschn
acceptable result.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:51 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: CP Message
>
> On Friday,
On Friday, 07/25/2008 at 12:58 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks to Alan's help and the pointer to the manual that he provided,
> the devices can now be detached without creating an error message. I had
> searched for that document number and only got an Operator's manual a
Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 1:22 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: CP Message
>
> On Thursday, 07/24/2008 at 04:05 EDT, "Schuh, Richard"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> w
On Thursday, 07/24/2008 at 04:39 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> What manual do you use to determine there is a special Unit Check? Is it
> online where I can see it?
I am using the IBM Publications Center,
http://www.elink.ibmlink.ibm.com/publications/servlet/pbi.wss and rea
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 1:22 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: CP Message
>
> On Thursday, 07/24/2008 at 04:05 EDT, "Schuh, Richard"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > The vendor of the pseudo tape unit has ch
On Thursday, 07/24/2008 at 04:05 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The vendor of the pseudo tape unit has changed several things in the
response
> during a Detach so that CP now issues only a single message,
"HCPERP2215A TAPE
> 0670 REQUIRES OPERATOR INTERVENTION; MAKE DRIVE
Maybe the device went 'Not Ready' before CP was able to send the
Rewind/Unload command and that is why CP wants Operator intervention, to
get
the tape rewound and unloaded.
/Tom Kern
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:04:44 -0700, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
e:
>
>The vendor of the pseudo tap
The vendor of the pseudo tape unit has changed several things in the
response during a Detach so that CP now issues only a single message,
"HCPERP2215A TAPE 0670 REQUIRES OPERATOR INTERVENTION; MAKE DRIVE
READY", which brings up a question. Why does CP care that the drive is
not ready when it is
21 matches
Mail list logo
