On Thursday, 12/18/2008 at 12:35 EST, Shimon Lebowitz
wrote:
> When I made the mode to BIS to add the exit call,
> I wrote a corresponding mod to my local exit module.
> So if I remove the HCPBIS mod, it will then go and
> delete the next 8 changes I made to POLCMD.
>
> I actually don't mind lea
You can indeed remove the line from the VVT file. And, also ERASE HCPBIS
AUXlcl, otherwise soem VMSES/E tools will warn about the difference between
VVT and AUX files.
And, you can run
VMFSIM GETLVL ZVM CP TDATA :PART HCPBIS TXT
to see how VMSES reacts (and which version of HCPBIS will be includ
First, thank you JR.
Luckily I looked it up, and ran it first with the (TEST option.
It seems that I cannot use this tool, since it wants to
remove all subsequent mods too.
When I made the mode to BIS to add the exit call,
I wrote a corresponding mod to my local exit module.
So if I remove the H
008 07:55 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Removing my old CP mod to HCPBIS
>
> Last month Alan Altmark helped me solve the problem
> I had modifying the model field of the user's CPUID as
> stored by the STIDP command, without modifying the
> code in HCPBI
Last month Alan Altmark helped me solve the problem
I had modifying the model field of the user's CPUID as
stored by the STIDP command, without modifying the
code in HCPBIS as I had been doing for years. (That
solution stopped working when SIE started storing the
CPUID from the VMDBK without drop
ltmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: CP mod to HCPBIS
>To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>
>On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 04:45 EST, Shimon Lebowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>> Thank you Alan for the information, but it is still not
totally clear to
On Tuesday, 11/18/2008 at 04:45 EST, Shimon Lebowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thank you Alan for the information, but it is still not totally clear to
me
> what is happening.
> It vaguely occurred to me that perhaps somehow SIE was doing it all
> now (as I wrote "bypass the simulation") a
(My sentmail shows I sent this reply last Tuesday, but since
the archives don't have it, I guess that explains why I got
no response. Here it is again)
Thank you Alan for the information, but it is still not totally clear to me
what is happening.
It vaguely occurred to me that perhaps som
On Tuesday, 11/11/2008 at 11:49 EST, Shimon Lebowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> This exit is working perfectly in a z/VM 4.4 system, but I am now
> having a problem in 5.3.
> In the past, STIDP was simulated by HCPBIS. Is it
> possible that now it is somehow managing to bypass
> that simulatio
Hi,
I must be doing something wrong, but I can't figure out what,
so I am asking here. :-)
I have a mod to HCPBIS which we have used for ages, since
VM/SP-3 (I guess it was probably DMKBIS back then).
The mod changes the CPU serial number field stored as a
result of a guest STIDP instruction, *
10 matches
Mail list logo
