Re: CSL question

2010-12-17 Thread Neale Ferguson
You are correct. I discovered that 10 minutes after asking the question. Tks anyway. On 12/17/10 11:50 PM, "Alan Altmark" wrote: I think you're missing the filemode. Without it, it's being interpreted as 'namedef1 namedef2'. Alan Altmark

Re: CSL question

2010-12-17 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 12/17/2010 at 01:11 EST, Neale Ferguson wrote: > I think I'm missing something obvious here but I've been staring at it so > long I can't see the problem. The code fragment - > > char exsbuff[sizeof(exsh_t) + sizeof(exsf_t)]; > int lExsbuff = sizeof(exsbuff); > char *fName = "PROFILE

CSL question

2010-12-17 Thread Neale Ferguson
I think I'm missing something obvious here but I've been staring at it so long I can't see the problem. The code fragment - char exsbuff[sizeof(exsh_t) + sizeof(exsf_t)]; int lExsbuff = sizeof(exsbuff); char *fName = "PROFILE EXEC"; int lFname = strlen(fName); int lCommit = 6; DMSCSL("DMSEXIST",