On Sunday, 03/07/2010 at 12:00 EST, Phil Smith III
wrote:
> But since both Timothy (on IBM-MAIN) and Alan (on IBMVM) have stated
that there
> is no official statement of direction, then the good news is that it's
not even
> a rumor at this point -- it's fiction. What we need to worry about i
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>Timothy Sipples recently posted that it was incorrect.
>He is the first IBM'r to say something about these 'plans'.
>Until I hear it from an official IBM source, it is a rumour.
Or a "rumor", in the US :-)
Count me firmly in the "this would be
