Re: IPGATE errors

2010-09-06 Thread Kris Buelens
I think I found the problem: when opening many files in different workunits, as many APPC connections are made to the SFS server as you have workunits. Even a return to CMS READY doesn't free these connections. The PIPE stages writing CMS files in SFS (even fn ft fm) have by default WORKUNIT

Re: IPGATE errors

2010-09-02 Thread Kris_Buelens
I'm struggling with IPGATE too: I've got some code that splits some MDISK resident files into 18 SFS files, these 18 files are open concurrently, a nd the SFS is remote, over IPGATE. When I tried it, the PIPE hangs, and IPGATE says: ... IPGATEY36 Request from MAINT for POOLSRC at 4567

Re: IPGATE errors

2010-09-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 09/02/2010 at 11:08 EDT, Kris_Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com wrote: I found Alan's response about OverridePrecedence and I added it to the local and remote TCP/IP stacks via OBEYFILE and restarted both IPGATEs. But that didn't help. As of z/VM 5.4, OverridePrecedence is no

Re: IPGATE errors

2010-09-02 Thread Schuh, Richard
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: IPGATE errors As of z/VM 5.4, OverridePrecedence is no longer required; it's one of those unchangeable defaults. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott

IPGATE errors

2008-10-02 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
I've been trying out IPGATE recently, because we have a couple of systems with no good alternatives for remote SFS access. One of our testers is reporting errors accessing a remote directory after the connection has been idle for several hours. I would love to open an ETR, but we all know that

Re: IPGATE errors

2008-10-02 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 10/02/2008 at 08:20 EDT, O'Brien, Dennis L Dennis.L.O'[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A couple of months ago, someone said that IBM has an internal version of IPGATE with some bugs fixed. Is there any chance of getting that on the VM Download page? Unlikely in the extreme. First,