My former customer's AUTOLOG1 performed a few checks before it even started
RACFVM. That function would get lost if CP would xautolog the ESM directly:
for example there was a time we needed an extra to VARY ON of some DASD
before we would go on. It also verified that the LPAR name matched the VM
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:09 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Alan Altmark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And while I'm halucinating, I would have a command that adds and
deletes
users from an autolog list. The list is in the warm start area. No
requirement for AUTOLOG
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:40 PM, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And while I'm halucinating, I would have a command that adds and deletes
> users from an autolog list. The list is in the warm start area. No
> requirement for AUTOLOG1 unless you want it. Oh, and the autologs would
> be
On Friday, 08/01/2008 at 10:01 EDT, Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I am thinking it would be a neat idea to put the XAUTOLOG as CP
> commands in the directory entry.
>
> :soapbox.
> It may be too late, but &deity should done RACF startup the other way
> around: change CP to start
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Thomas Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that is still one layer of activity too much. The ESM should be as
> much a part of a WARM start as DISKACNT, EREP and OPERATNS. There should be
> an extendable list of MANDATORY svms in the system config file and the
I think that is still one layer of activity too much. The ESM should be a
s
much a part of a WARM start as DISKACNT, EREP and OPERATNS. There should
be
an extendable list of MANDATORY svms in the system config file and they
should all be autologed during a WARM start. A FORCE, COLD, CLEAN start
im
That fixed it, many thanks!
i
-- Original Message --
Received: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:48:21 PM BST
From: Kris Buelens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Loosing IP after IPL: CTC free
> It is in the PEROFILE EXEC of AUTOLOG1 that you must insert an
> XA
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Kris Buelens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is in the PEROFILE EXEC of AUTOLOG1 that you must insert an
> XAUTOLOG TCPIP. AUTOLOG1 is started after a CP IPL, it's only task is
> to start other users. If you'd have RACFVM, AUTOLOG1 only starts
> RACFVM; RACFVM the
. Worthington
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 8:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Loosing IP after IPL: CTC free
I've successfully run IPWIZARD and can connect to my system until I ipl.
After that I notice that the CTC is FREE, whereas after IPWIZARD its
"ATTACHED
TO TCPIP".
I'm
PIP defintion?
>
> Apologies for my ignorance.
>
> ian
> ...
>
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> Received: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:22:19 PM BST
> From: Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Loosing IP after IPL:
CPIP0E41
Is it just a case of adding an XAUTOLOG to the TCPIP defintion?
Apologies for my ignorance.
ian
...
-- Original Message --
Received: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 02:22:19 PM BST
From: Rob van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Loosing IP after
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Ian S. Worthington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've successfully run IPWIZARD and can connect to my system until I ipl.
>
> After that I notice that the CTC is FREE, whereas after IPWIZARD its "ATTACHED
> TO TCPIP".
>
> I'm guessing this is the cause of the problem.
I've successfully run IPWIZARD and can connect to my system until I ipl.
After that I notice that the CTC is FREE, whereas after IPWIZARD its "ATTACHED
TO TCPIP".
I'm guessing this is the cause of the problem. What do I have to do to make
this sticky please?
ian
...
Ian S. Worthington, MBCS.
13 matches
Mail list logo
