On 5/11/06, Larry Macioce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
z/VM Version 5 Release 1.0, Service Level 0501 (64-bit)
With z/VM 5.2 your problem will be gone I think (the number is not
reported anymore). :-)
You really need other instrumentation than CP IND to understand what
you can do with your syste
Hi: In zvm 5.2 the field is removed, finally. I would suggest in *MOST*
cases that this number isn't all that good an indicator of much. It's
defined as total pages used by in-queue users. I can't recall any
situations where it has been helpful in performance analysis.
David
Larry Macioce wrot
Sorry about that. We are running (straight from maint):
z/VM Version 5 Release 1.0, Service Level 0501 (64-bit)
thanks
Mace
Hi Larry: What version of zvm? The storage number reported on INDICATE
may not be all that indicative of a problem. Anyway in this case release
matters, so provide us with that info.
David
Larry Macioce wrote:
I removed several linux guests yesterday and when I did an indicate the
storage lo
I removed several linux guests yesterday and when I did an indicate the
storage looked higher than normal. I've seen it in high 90s-10x(x=1-9)
but
it has been sitting at 11x since yesterday. We aren't really doing anythi
ng
with the 6 remaining guests.
Several weeks ago we were hitting the t
