On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:06:26 -0500, Stephen Frazier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
us wrote:
That will never get past an auditor who has read about but doesn't under
stand REXEC. :)
David Boyes wrote:
Move his files to SFS, export the SFS directory via NFS to a Linux
guest, and configure REXEC on the
Excellent summary of the situation by the Man from Endicott.
[insert theme music from Man from U.N.C.L.E. here]
I recommend a POSIX target for SSH into z/VM.
From there, after one has signed on using a name that matches *your* VMID,
one can issue CP, CMS, or Pipelines commands by proxy. Full
I don't understand why the Unix/Linux world prefers SFTP to FTPS
Implementation of SFTP doesn't require certificate management
infrastructure and expensive certificates from external organizations.
Ssh is also open source and freely distributed; few if any FTPS clients
or servers are.
The
On Wednesday, 04/30/2008 at 01:20 EDT, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I don't understand why the Unix/Linux world prefers SFTP to FTPS
Implementation of SFTP doesn't require certificate management
infrastructure and expensive certificates from external organizations.
Ssh is also open
Implementation of SFTP doesn't require certificate management
infrastructure and expensive certificates from external
organizations.
Ssh is also open source and freely distributed; few if any FTPS
clients
or servers are.
No certificate management? Feh. You are responsible to adhere to
That will never get past an auditor who has read about but doesn't understand
REXEC. :)
David Boyes wrote:
Move his files to SFS, export the SFS directory via NFS to a Linux
guest, and configure REXEC on the Linux guest via a private guest LAN
that is not connected to external network to
Why is an SSH daemon absolutely fundamental and prerequisite to a CMS
SCP command to move a PDF from my A-disk to one of my linux servers
for
serving via Apache?
It's not. I'm working on porting the PuTTY standalone utilities. They
don't require a local SSH server.
Excellent.
That product, I might pay for out of my own pocket.
/Tom Kern
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:46:36 -0400, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
rote:
Why is an SSH daemon absolutely fundamental and prerequisite to a CMS
SCP command to move a PDF from my A-disk to one of my linux servers
for
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:08:36 -0400, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There is an inherent architectural problem with an ssh *server* on VM: T
he
IP connection does not terminate in your virtual machine. When you logi
n
to a system with ssh, you are expected to have logged into your own
Alan Ackerman wrote:
In previous discussions here, there was a feeling that an ssh *client* in
CMS was more important than having the ability to ssh *into* the system.
CMS is not a multiuser system. SSH into CMS directly does not make
sense, because an
SSH server is a
On Monday, 04/28/2008 at 05:05 EDT, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why? What is wrong with OpenSSH?
Trick question. :-) There is nothing wrong with OpenSSH.
But remember that in a VM system, we're talking about virtual machines,
not processes. There is no hierarchy of virtual
Now for the really stupid question.
Why is an SSH daemon absolutely fundamental and prerequisite to a CMS
SCP command to move a PDF from my A-disk to one of my linux servers for
serving via Apache?
/Tom Kern
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Monday, 04/28/2008 at 05:05 EDT, McKown, John
[EMAIL
On Monday, 04/28/2008 at 07:53 EDT, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why is an SSH daemon absolutely fundamental and prerequisite to a CMS
SCP command to move a PDF from my A-disk to one of my linux servers for
serving via Apache?
It's not. As I said, the ssh client side (used by scp)
On Apr 24, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Thomas Kern wrote:
I thought SFTP was an ftp like command set inside the SSH protocol
and that FTPS was the FTP protected by SSL. Our Network gurus keep
referring too out SSL protected TN3270 as TELNETS and even insisted
on us using port 992 for it since that
I know. I have been in too many conversations where I say that z/VM can
support FTPS and the other instantly say 'Good, we can use SFTP from our
SSH sessions.' So I have to re-educate them and 2 months later the scene
repeats with the same cast of characters. At times, I regret having
worked
No. No one has ported OpenSSH (not even the outbound commandline
functions like scp/sftp) to z/VM-CMS.
www.ssh.com does reference a product for z/OS, but a search of their
website does not have a single document containing 'z/VM'.
/Tom Kern
Alan Ackerman wrote:
Does z/VM support SCP/SFTP
Does z/VM support SCP/SFTP functionality?
No. That would require a working SSH. VM implements FTPS.
On Apr 23, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Alan Ackerman wrote:
Does z/VM support SCP/SFTP functionality?
No. SFTP is the FTP command set (mostly) over an SSH channel.
Sine Nomine has an FTP-to-SFTP broker, so you can FTP out from CMS,
through a Linux guest (so there's no traffic on the wire
On Wednesday, 04/23/2008 at 08:04 EDT, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No. No one has ported OpenSSH (not even the outbound commandline
functions like scp/sftp) to z/VM-CMS.
www.ssh.com does reference a product for z/OS, but a search of their
website does not have a single document
I thought SFTP was an ftp like command set inside the SSH protocol and
that FTPS was the FTP protected by SSL. Our Network gurus keep referring
too out SSL protected TN3270 as TELNETS and even insisted on us using
port 992 for it since that was set in some RFC.
/Tom Kern
Adam Thornton wrote:
20 matches
Mail list logo
