OK, I appended my original post so the picture would be available. To
answer several responders: convincing my network people is no problem,
the
problem is they don't know any more than I do because I'm the network peo
ple
;-( To Gary, thanks for the flex info, I never thought to look
OK, I seem to have made a breakthrough. I had an error in the defaultne
t
on level 2 (had changed an IP address midsream) and that allowed me to pi
ng
the 192.168.1.221 address on level 1. Then I put on my network guy hat a
nd
made a change in our lan router and that lets me ping between my lan
OK, I appended my original post so the picture would be available.
To
answer several responders: convincing my network people is no
problem,
the
problem is they don't know any more than I do because I'm the network
peo
ple
;-(
Any ideas?
On the device that is the default route for
I need to be able to communicate from multiple level 2 VM systems to my
level 1 VM system as well as to the PCs located on my local lan. I chose
a VM Guest Lan using Hipersockets as the solution to my problem. I have
the guest lan set up and can ping from level 1 to level 2 and vice versa.
The
What does NETSTAT GATE and HOME show for both stacks?
David
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Russ Burtnett
Sent: Fri 1/19/2007 10:22 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Routing problem from level2 VM guest
I need to be able to communicate
Level 1...
netstat gate
VM TCP/IP Netstat Level 520
Known IPv4 gateways:
Hi Russ. It may be the routers connected to the PC do not know where subnet
192.168.200.x is. The network guys can help you with this or for a quick test
you can use the PC route statement to identify to your PC how to get to the
192.168.200.x subnet.
You may wish to talk to the network guys
On Friday, 01/19/2007 at 09:22 CST, Russ Burtnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I need to be able to communicate from multiple level 2 VM systems to my
level 1 VM system as well as to the PCs located on my local lan. I
chose
a VM Guest Lan using Hipersockets as the solution to my problem. I have
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:49:08 -0500, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since you're on z/VM 5.2, use a VSWITCH instead of a Guest LAN. Then yo
u
don't need to worry about routing or creating another subnet. Easiest i
s
to just assign them 192.168.1.xx addresses in the existing subnet.
On Friday, 01/19/2007 at 01:41 CST, Russ Burtnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for the info, I was intending to use the VSWITCH in the first
place
but I thought I needed a real OSA to do that and I'm on a FLEX system.
I'll
go back to the manuals and see if I can get that to work. If not,
On Jan 19, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Friday, 01/19/2007 at 01:41 CST, Russ Burtnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for the info, I was intending to use the VSWITCH in the first
place
but I thought I needed a real OSA to do that and I'm on a FLEX
system.
I'll
go back to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
