mine alone and do not necessarily
> represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.
>
>
>
> "Alan Ackerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System"
>
> 06/10/2008 11:41 PM
>
> Please respond to
> "
to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System"
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SFS Control Data Backup
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:17:39 -0700, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
e:
>It sure would be nice to know who is hammering the server. It is tough
>to correct
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:17:39 -0700, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
e:
>It sure would be nice to know who is hammering the server. It is tough
>to correct a problem when it can't be defined.
>
>Regards,
>Richard Schuh
There is some IUCV data in the monitor. I don't have access to (do
Tuesday, June 10, 2008 1:10 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: SFS Control Data Backup
>
> The SFS performance stats don't report about end-users, just
> what SFS as a whole is doing... Similar to Q FILEPOOL STATUS
>
> 2008/6/10 Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROT
ns
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:25 PM
>> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>> Subject: Re: SFS Control Data Backup
>>
>> I meant you could see agents more active than usual... To know it
>> all: turn on Auditing (disruptive change)
>>
>> 2008/6/10 Schuh, Richard <
System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 12:25 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: SFS Control Data Backup
>
> I meant you could see agents more active than usual... To know it
> all: turn on Auditing (disruptive c
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:13 AM
>> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>> Subject: Re: SFS Control Data Backup
>>
>> Maybe Q FILEPOOL AGENT
>>
>> 2008/6/10 Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > Next questi
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:13 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: SFS Control Data Backup
>
> Maybe Q FILEPOOL AGENT
>
> 2008/6/10 Sc
h
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sue Farrell
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:31 AM
>> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>> Subject: Re: SFS Control Data Backup
&g
ECTED] On Behalf Of Sue Farrell
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 8:31 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: SFS Control Data Backup
>
> No, there isn't a way to specify the threshold. It will
> start automatically when the log is 80% full.
>
> You could p
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: SFS Control Data Backup
>
> No, there isn't a way to specify the threshold. It will
> start automatically when the log is 80% full.
>
> You could probably write some kind of tool to use the output
> of QUERY FILEPOOL LOG to detect
No, there isn't a way to specify the threshold. It will start
automatically when the log is 80% full.
You could probably write some kind of tool to use the output of QUERY
FILEPOOL LOG to detect a threshold and send a BACKUP request to the file
pool server machine.
Sue Farrell
Is there a way to change the threshold for initiation of a CDB
dynamically or is it only in the start-up? Searching the "File Pool
Planning, Administration and Operation" manual has so far turned up a
blank.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
13 matches
Mail list logo
