Re: Source maintenance was Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-08-04 Thread Anne Lynn Wheeler
, but it could generate update files to reproduce the effects of an edit session. That's one of the CMS facilities I miss the most. re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006o.html#19 Source maintenance was Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS the aux files, control files, update files scheme was what was created

Re: Source maintenance was Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-08-04 Thread Peter Flass
Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote: I guess most unix people use cvs, rcs, etc. nowadays, as someone posted. There used to be lots of use of diff and patch. Lacking sequence numbers, they worked either by line nunber or by using one or more lines of context to identify the line to be changed.

Re: Source maintenance was Re: SEQUENCE NUMBERS

2006-08-04 Thread Brian Inglis
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 21:18:17 GMT in alt.folklore.computers, Peter Flass [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote: I guess most unix people use cvs, rcs, etc. nowadays, as someone posted. There used to be lots of use of diff and patch. Lacking sequence numbers, they worked either by