The DO QUEUED() is not required, there is only one stacked message for
an SMSG or IUCV event.
If however you also use WAKEUP's FILE option, the WAKEUP file entry
that (could have) caused is **in all interrupt cases** stacked first
(before the entry of an SMSG for example).
If more SMSGs (or
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:07:06 +0200 Kris Buelens said:
The DO QUEUED() is not required, there is only one stacked message for
an SMSG or IUCV event.
You are correct Kris. I just ran a test where I flooded my WAKEUP
with 10 SMSGs in quick succession. Tey were all processed one at a
time.
But I
Either you sent that many SMSGs that CP's buffer of (255?) was
overflowed, either some of the SMSGs caused your server to execute a
command that uses VMCF, RAC and NETSTAT are just two examples. PIPE
VMC is another obvious example.
2009/4/23 Fran Hensler f...@zvm.sru.edu:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:33 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: WAKEUP Order of Processing
What I coded in RxServer: when a RDR file is found, the RDR_Event
We have an EXEC that has within it: 'WAKEUP (SMSG RDR QUIET'
According to HELP WAKEUP:
Seven WAKEUP options cause data to be stacked: EXT, FILE, IO, IUCVMSG,
SMSG,
TIME, and VMCF. WAKEUP stacks the data in the following order regardless
of
the order the options are specified when you invoke
What I coded in RxServer: when a RDR file is found, the RDR_Event subroutine
basically issues
'PIPE CP Q RDR *!stem rdrfiles.'
do i=1 to rdrfiles.0
Otherwise: test it
Code a CP SLEEP in the RDR file handler
then send a file and an SMSG and see what WAKEUP calles first
2009/4/22
On Wednesday, 04/22/2009 at 11:49 EDT, James Stracka (DHL US)
james.stra...@dhl.com wrote:
My question is: If the EXEC is doing some processing for a prior
WAKEUP trigger and several READER files come to it and somewhere in the
process an SMSG command is sent to it, will the SMSG command be
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:07 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: WAKEUP Order of Processing
On Wednesday, 04/22/2009 at 11:49 EDT, James Stracka
And it will keep on reporting that if you do not insure that all (eligible)
reader files are purged, transferred or held before the next WAKEUP command.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
RDR simply reports that you have one or more (eligible) files in your RDR.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM
Jim -
I found out the hard way that when WAKEUP gives you RC=5 that there
may be more then one message to be processed.
When I wrote this EXEC I assumed that there was only one message and
every once in a while I would lose one.
Here is part of an EXEC:
'CP SET SMSG IUCV'
Do Forever
'WAKEUP
10 matches
Mail list logo
