Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore

2008-04-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/2008 at 01:58 EDT, Franz Josef Pohlen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have found ou a curious behaviour with DDR Restore. If had the following situation. I have backed up a VSE volume with DUMP ALL. At the test recovery site I have restored it with RESTORE ALL. I thought all mdisks started at physical

Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore

2008-04-17 Thread Jim Bohnsack
Franz--Perhaps what you are seeing as a problem is related to your first posting where you said: I thought all mdisks started at physical cylinder 1 so I defined the mdisk accordingly in the USER DIRECT, but this volume was historically a fullpack minidisk at the original site. Mdisks don't

Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore

2008-04-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim, I think there is a misunderstanding. What I meant is, that the mdisk started at physical cylinder 1 on the dasd. I din't mean the cylinder 1 of the minidisk. kind regards Franz Josef Pohlen Jim Bohnsack schrieb: Franz--Perhaps what you are seeing as a problem is related to your first

Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore

2008-04-17 Thread Schuh, Richard
. Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:36 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore Alan, But the main

Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore

2008-04-17 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 04/17/2008 at 07:36 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, your objection is principally correct, but first the message you mentioned appears always also when you restore a cylinder range from a 530RES DDR DUMP to a correctly defined minidisk with RESTORE xxx TO yyy

Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore

2008-04-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 4:36 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore Alan, But the main reason why I think that DDR should abend or at least give a return code other than zero

Re: curious behaviour of DDR Restore

2008-04-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok, let's end the philosophic discussion, wether that is an error or not, but thank you for opening the internal problem. My customer has zVM 5.3 but no extended support. So I will not open a pmr on it. I will pay attention to do all things correctly in case of fire. Thank you to all who have

curious behaviour of DDR RESTORE ALL

2008-04-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@moderator: Sorry, I have sent the message first with the wrong sender email. Please delete the mail with the wrong address. Hi listers, I have found ou a curious behaviour with DDR Restore. If had the following situation. I have backed up a VSE volume with DUMP ALL. At the test recovery

curious behaviour of DDR Restore

2008-04-14 Thread Franz Josef Pohlen
Hi listers, I have found ou a curious behaviour with DDR Restore. If had the following situation. I have backed up a VSE volume with DUMP ALL. At the test recovery site I have restored it with RESTORE ALL. I thought all mdisks started at physical cylinder 1 so I defined the mdisk accordingly