On Thursday, 12/21/2006 at 06:35 EST, Gregg Reed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd second that. The PTK is great at what it does and while I was doing
an
extensive comparison a year ago, it's where I'd point operators and RTM
familiar folk to, it is a huge upgrade to RTM, but it takes an FMR/not
However, if you're going
to take her out on the Autobahn and redline it, you gotta have 'em.
(Otherwise how would you know you're redlining it? Remember, the CPU
doesn't make noise as you rev it up.)
Requirement! Requirement!
(Find some of those Sequent guys you bought up. *They* do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
ARK.EDU Re: z/VM 5.2 ESAMON vs IBM PTK
regarding SYTSHS_RSASHARE monitor
record
Hello,
I've been comparing the Velocity ESAMON and IBM Performance Toolkit
products on z/VM 5.2, and have noticed that they disagree on the value of
the SYTSHS_RSASHARE monitor record. According to the IBM doc, the
SYTSHS_RSASHARE monitor record represents Cardinal count of resident shared
