Check with the lawyers, but I think that you will find that this
is strictly a US view of patents. In every other country any public
disclosure anywhere immediately voids the right to patent. Even
NDA disclosure can be tricky, because an offer for sale counts
as a disclosure.
Stewart
Doug Ro
Salvador Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think that as much conflicts that can be solved without the traditional
>way: regulation + represion = burocracy + injustice, will be better for
users.
>But on privacy questions we can try first to give technical solutions, i.e.
>ways to follow stamped
Title: MPLS and Private Network
Dear Friends,
A company consists of 2 remotely separated sites, A and B. A leased T1 line connects the networks on these 2 sites together. We generally call the company's network a private network since the connection between the 2 sites are private leased lin
Brijesh Kumar wrote:
> Granting of patents only means that a person grated a particular patent
> was first to make "a claim" about the novelty of an idea or technique
> as far as the patent office knows on the basis of "previous claims submitted
> to it.".
At least in the US, at least sometimes,
Masataka Ohta wrote:
> We can have servers outside of US and there is no legislation (even
> under US laws. note that the servers can serve yet another countries)
> to make the servers illegal.
Mmm...that sounds like a grey area. A company using patented tech to do
business in the US may be sub
I am writing to request that the RFC Editor not publish
draft-cerpa-necp-02.txt as an RFC in its current form,
for the following reasons:
1. The document repeatedly, and misleadingly, refers to NECP as a
standard. I do not believe this is appropriate for a document
which is not on the IETF sta
Title: MPLS and Private Network
David
Wang writes:
A company consists of 2 remotely
separated sites, A and B. A leased T1 line connects the networks on these 2
sites together. We generally call the company's network a private network
since the connection between the 2 sites are priv
Hi,
The RMONMIB WG intends to hold an interim meeting to
work on all aspects of the new charter. This includes:
- Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
- Transport Performance Metrics (TPM)
- User-Defined TopN Monitoring MIB (UsrTopN)
- DIFFSERV Monitoring MIB (DS-MON)
Meeting Dat
John;
> > We can have servers outside of US and there is no legislation (even
> > under US laws. note that the servers can serve yet another countries)
> > to make the servers illegal.
>
> Mmm...that sounds like a grey area. A company using patented tech to do
> business in the US may be subjec
Note: forwarded message attached.
=
Ben Davis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com
Attn: Mr.John Roemer; Reporter for the Pacific
Standard
and Ms. Donna Soto; VP fo
> I am writing to request that the RFC Editor not publish
> draft-cerpa-necp-02.txt as an RFC in its current form,
> for the following reasons:
> 2. A primary purpose of the NECP protocol appears to be to
> facilitate the operation of so-called interception proxies. Such
> proxies violate t
11 matches
Mail list logo
