Re: HTML email

2000-05-16 Thread Harald Tveit Alvestrand
At 17:32 15.05.2000 -0600, Vernon Schryver wrote: When was the last time you received a multipart/alternative message that did not make the sender look stupid, malicious, or both? I can't remember ever receiving any other kind of multipart/alternative. FWIW, as a lone Eudora user in a pond of

Re: HTML email

2000-05-16 Thread RJ Atkinson
At 02:12 16-05-00 , Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: It seems to be usually the case, for most messages that I've seen, that there's *no* added value to the HTML version. I.e., other than adding BR at the end of lines, and using microsoft-specific font settings at the beginning of each paragraph

Mobile Ad hoc

2000-05-16 Thread zozo
What are the benefits gained from "Integeration between Mobile IP and Ad hoc networks" ?

Explicit Rate flow control in IP.

2000-05-16 Thread Mahadevan Iyer
I was curious to know why support or a standard for explicit rate flow control to be provided by ISP's has not been considered in IETF yet. I hope this general list is the best suited to posting my message. As we well know, even simple scalable explicit rate protocols similar to EPRCA or

Outlook finally patched!

2000-05-16 Thread James P. Salsman
MS Makes E-mail Virus Patch By MICHAEL J MARTINEZ AP Business Writer 05/15/00 SEATTLE (AP) -- Charged with enabling easy access for computer viruses like the Love Bug, Microsoft is altering its popular Outlook e-mail software to prevent users from running any "executable'' program

Video on IP

2000-05-16 Thread Andrea
Dear IETF People, I am working into the video broadcast market (terrestrial and Satellite tv channels), and more and more people are demanding solution to deliver streaming video on IP. For some application I am working on, I would like to webcast video using or Windows Media MP4 format or

Mobile Ad hoc

2000-05-16 Thread zozo
What are the benefits from "Integeration between Mobile IP and Ad hoc networks"?

Re: HTML email

2000-05-16 Thread Pete Resnick
On 5/15/00 at 9:12 PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: It seems to be usually the case, for most messages that I've seen, that there's *no* added value to the HTML version. I.e., other than adding BR at the end of lines, and using microsoft-specific font settings at the beginning of each

Re: HTML email

2000-05-16 Thread Greg Skinner
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder how many people are still using plain-text, non-HTML enabled mail readers? It still happens on some mailing list, where someone will send a base-64 encoded html'ified message (usually using MS Outlook), and someone will send back "try