Sheet!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi! We are Russian girls. We would like to
> correspond with you. Visit our site and see our photos.
> www.rus-pretti.narod.ru
> With interest, girls.
>
> P.S. This is not spam. You can unsubscribe at any time by sending an email
> to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with th
Beni Arazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Somebody just made a comment:
>> "While the last thing I want to do is promote the use of the IETF list as
>> a network help line..."
>>
>> There is nothing wrong in giving, for free, good professional advices to
>> research students and start-up personn
At 02:32 PM 8/29/00, Beni Arazi wrote:
>Somebody just made a comment:
>"While the last thing I want to do is promote the use of the IETF list as
>a network help line..."
>
>There is nothing wrong in giving, for free, good professional advices to
>research students and start-up personnel, as a serv
Somebody just made a comment:
"While the last thing I want to do is promote the use of the IETF list as
a network help line..."
There is nothing wrong in giving, for free, good professional advices to
research students and start-up personnel, as a service to the community.
This is especially tru
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Charles Nzerem wrote:
> I am in the planning stage of a VPN implementation solution, and I have
> chosen to do a hardware solution type. The current network flow is
>
> Users ---
> SwitchesFirewallRouter---Internet.
>
> I want to know at wh
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 21:17:07 +0530, Sivashankaran R said:
> Is there a possible smart router that just priorotizes packets based on its
> contents in a secure and scalabale N/W ??
Possible. Maybe. High-performance? If it's possible, we don't know how
to do it. We have enough trouble just
Is there a possible smart router that just priorotizes packets based on its
contents in a secure and scalabale N/W ??
Thanks ,
Siva
>
>If "active network" means "the endpoints can program the
>routers", then probably never. It's an interesting idea, but
>it'd be much too hard to mak