Re: Mobile Multimedia Messaging Service

2000-09-16 Thread Patrik Fältström
At 14.52 -0700 00-09-15, James P. Salsman wrote: If there has been no charter proposed for a MMMS working group, I intend to propose one as follows. I have no memory of a charter. Proposed milestones: The goals of the MMMS WG will include the publication of specifications, as described above,

Re: Mobile Multimedia Messaging Service

2000-09-16 Thread Patrik Fältström
At 08.12 -0400 00-09-16, vint cerf wrote: would it be useful, in the context of establishing peer-to-peer communications (or even client/server communications) with limited-function mobile devices, to use SIP as a framework for negotiating the parameters that should guide the nature of the

Re: Mobile Multimedia Messaging Service

2000-09-16 Thread Leslie Daigle
Howdy, "James P. Salsman" wrote: Proposed special document status and process for MMMS specifications: Recognizing that it may be impossible to achieve consensus on topics in which large and diverse corporate concerns have vested interests opposed to open standards, the MMMS working group

Re: Mobile Multimedia Messaging Service

2000-09-16 Thread Leslie Daigle
Howdy, Yes, RESCAP should be doing this. (Too many people with full plates, not enough people poking -- so poke ;-) Leslie. Patrik Fältström wrote: At 08.12 -0400 00-09-16, vint cerf wrote: would it be useful, in the context of establishing peer-to-peer communications (or even

Re: Mobile Multimedia Messaging Service

2000-09-16 Thread Henning Schulzrinne
Depending on the assumptions, it seems that either capability discovery integrated with the actual protocol or a separate protocol (as in rescap) makes sense. (Among other considerations, this depends on requirements for setup delay, number of message exchanges or restrictions on information