To: The Internet Technical Community
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2000 17:44:56 -0700 (PDT), "James P. Salsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
James> (1) End-to-End Internet Services for Mobile Devices
James> Scope: Specifications and interoperability guidelines for
James> end-to-end mobile I
Patrik,
Thank you for your reply:
>>... guidelines for TCP operation during
>> indefinite wireless link downtime
>
> I think this must be syncronized with the work of the PILC wg. See
> http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pilc-charter.html
Yes, the next document milestone from PLIC seems to
The
Lightweight & Efficient Application Protocol
(LEAP)
Manifesto
Shaping the Future of Mobile & Wireless
Applications Industry
A Call to Action
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Mohsen Ba
At 09:23 AM 9/16/00 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
>At 08:12 AM 9/16/00 -0400, vint cerf wrote:
>>would it be useful, in the context of establishing peer-to-peer
>>communications
>>(or even client/server communications) with limited-function mobile devices,
>>to use SIP as a framework for negotiating
Mohsen,
Thank you for your message:
> A large body of work exists which addresses the Mobile Messaging
> area
>
> LEAP: Lightweight and Efficient Application Protocol.
>...
> Those who want to build good things and move forward fast, can evaluate
> the merits of LEAP and participa
Hi,
We don't need yet-another mail delivery protocol by some new forum.
We have already e.g. SIP which is capable of carrying MIME messages,
including multipart
and which supports capability negotiation.
--
Petri
> -Original Message-
> From: EXT James P. Salsman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 01:55:21 -0700 (PDT), "James P. Salsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>said:
>> Those who want to build good things and move forward fast, can evaluate
>> the merits of LEAP and participate in its evolution and enhancement.
>>
>> The starting point URL is: http://www.l
Here are some questions about the plic minutes:
http://pilc.grc.nasa.gov/pilc/list/archive/0967.html
> TCP over Wireless draft. The working group charter specifies that
> PILC will produce a 'TCP over Wireless' RFC that is a meta list of
> the existing PILC recommendations. This was re
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 12:04:10 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
petri> Hi,
petri> We don't need yet-another mail delivery protocol by some new forum.
petri> We have already e.g. SIP which is capable of carrying MIME messages,
petri> including multipart
petri> and which supports capab
> These documents would become de facto standards (although they won't
> have had the standards-review) and they would break the paradigm
> of Internet-Drafts (which is "don't implement").
May I respectfully resubmit "don't implement" as:
"Please understand that any experience you gain implement
Mohsen BANAN-Public wrote:
> Remember the web (http, ...)?
> What was IETF's role in Internet's main modern application?
You mean aside from MIME?
--
Eliot Lear
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mohsen;
> James> (1) End-to-End Internet Services for Mobile Devices
>
> James> Scope: Specifications and interoperability guidelines for
> James> end-to-end mobile IP connection and transport services required
> James> for support of standard Internet messaging ...
>
>
> The beauty
Reiner,
Thanks for your reply:
>>... There seems to be a lack of understanding about the
>> parameters involved, and most if not all of the important ones are
>> at least touched on in the DoCoMo I-D and the documents it cites.
>
> You need to be more precise. Which parameters are you talking a
13 matches
Mail list logo
