Is there any information available re the percentage of web servers
and
clients which actually use TLS instead of SSL?
John
On my information the SSL used to web server is used in 80 % in italy this
is my information on my country
Ciao Alessio
The Internet Area ADs felt that it would be useful to bring to your
attention a mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), archive and
web site for discussion of Internet Personal Appliances (formerly known as
Networked Appliances) research. To subscribe to the list, e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with
rfc2329 may help you.
ParameterResponses Min Mode Mean Max
_
Max routers in domain8 203505101000
Max routers in single area 8 20
Bienvenue en ligne!
Votre
site est maintenant inscrit sur un outil de recherche, et les autres ? Votre
site est-il actif ? connu ? Reconnu ? Vous posez-vous des questions relatives aux mthodes
permettant de le faire connatre ? Votre promotion actuelle vous satisfait-elle ? Dsirez
vous
See http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs/internet/internet-telephony.html
http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip
--
Henning Schulzrinne http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs
At 10:30 PM -0500 1/24/01, J. Noel Chiappa wrote:
PS: Those of you with sharp eyes will notice that everything has a class A
address!
...and that some of those addresses still work, and appear to be used
by folks directly related to the original owners. If only URLs could
be so persistent...
Keep in mind that the limitations of OSPF can actually be the total number
of subnetworks rather than the total number of routers. Cisco recommends
that you not have an OSPF area with more than 90-100 routers. Additionally
it is Cisco's recommendation that you not have more than 200 subnetworks
I have asked for an InfiniBand MIB BOF at the Minneapolis meeting. Anyone
who is interested in standardizing the Infiniband MIBs are asked to join the
mailing list by sending a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the first line of the body of the message put
subscribe IBMIB
This message bounced
Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
At 10:30 PM -0500 1/24/01, J. Noel Chiappa wrote:
PS: Those of you with sharp eyes will notice that everything has a class A
address!
...and that some of those addresses still work, and appear to be used
by folks directly related to the original owners. If only
| I hear that people aren't passing prefixes longer than /20. Is this
| true, and how broadly is this being implemented? If I wanted to advertise
| my own IP space (say a /24) instead of space provided by my ISP, would many
| ISP's not pass my route because of prefix length?
I am
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001 16:20:54 CST, Brian E Carpenter said:
However, I have to observe that this strange thing called ARPANET
appears to be using private addresses :-)
So damned private some people started CSNet and Bitnet because they
couldnt' get Arpanet addresses ;)
--
Randy Bush writes:
| how well do you think this scales? if the isp(s) you are asking think of
| it as what could be the first of a few thousand such requests, do you think
| 'small' payment might be a bit optimistic?
Well, you could bribe Curtis to drop some PRDB software on you and...
*
* However, I have to observe that this strange thing called ARPANET
* appears to be using private addresses :-)
*
* And I assume there were ALGs to translate between NCP and TCP hosts...
*
*
Nope. Dual stacks.
Bob Braden
*--Steve Bellovin,
Title: RE: VOICE OVER IP
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/44/solutions/network/voice.shtml
sorry
missed the url first time - jet lag ;-0
-Original Message-From: Krishna Sankar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 6:59
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
However, I have to observe that this strange thing called ARPANET
appears to be using private addresses :-)
I think it was Danny Cohen who said that in the US the private networks are
public and the public networks are private.
Bob
Title: RE: Blast from the past
Ah, dual stacks, a time tested transition strategy. But there was some Application Layer Gateway cruft (ALG) although not at the level of sophistication and beauty of a NAT ...
From RFC 801:
Because all hosts can not be converted to TCP simultaneously, and
Kind of like public schools in England which are private ;-)
I think NATs should be loaded with the final copy of HOSTS.TXT
and assign names on the net 10 side accordingly...
Ole
Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher
The Internet Protocol Journal
Office of the CTO, Cisco Systems
Tel: +1
we never actually did this though
vint
At 05:52 PM 1/25/2001 -0800, Peter Ford wrote:
Ah, dual stacks, a time tested transition strategy. But there was some Application
Layer Gateway cruft (ALG) although not at the level of sophistication and beauty of a
NAT ...
From RFC 801:
Because all
18 matches
Mail list logo
