hello.

help _ ÍøÉ϶©»¨È«¹úËÍ http://shopping.263.net/category12.htm ÊýÂë²úÆ·£¬ÜöÝÍÕ¹Âô http://shopping.263.net/category21.htm

RE: Out of Office AutoReply: switch vs router

Hello, X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) represents a service within Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 that is responsible for all Internet services. Regards, Jeremy McGowan Systems Consultant, MCSE, CCDA, CCNA, CSSP, Master TCP/IP Administrator, A+, Network + atec|group Technology In

Re: Out of Office AutoReply: switch vs router

> From: "J. Noel Chiappa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... > X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) > > Anyone know whose email software this is? ... After my previous modest proposals that the IETF list reject all messages displaying "Mailer: Internet Mail Service" stigmata, I was told th

Re: presentation-prep as safety hazard

% % On the way here, the flight attendant insisted that I turn off my Palm Pilot. % % Do they make people turn off hearing aids? % % d/ % Nope, nor oxygen. -- --bill

MIDTAX (middlebox taxonomy) mailing list

Mailing list information for follow up to the MIDTAX BOF that took place today: Post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Un)Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive:yes, but web access not yet available Apologies for spamming the whole IETF list with this, we goofed and didn't have this informati

Re: presentation-prep as safety hazard

At 09:11 PM 3/19/2001, RL 'Bob' Morgan wrote: >On the plane last night, flying in to Minneapolis: > >"We're now starting our descent, please return your tray tables and seat >backs to their upright and locked position, and turn off any electronic >equipment." > >2 minutes later: > >"People! We re

presentation-prep as safety hazard

On the plane last night, flying in to Minneapolis: "We're now starting our descent, please return your tray tables and seat backs to their upright and locked position, and turn off any electronic equipment." 2 minutes later: "People! We really need you to turn those laptops off NOW ..." - R

Re: Out of Office AutoReply: switch vs router

So, my message to the IETF list produced the usual cascade of "Out-Of-Office Autoreply" messages, fromn people I've never heard of, and who *certainly* weren't in the "To:" or "Cc:" fields of the header. I'm going to withhold the names of the guilty (they were all from completely different compa

Re: switch vs router

> From: "Mike O'Dell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > the distinction is often based on the namespace used for making the > forwarding decision > the term "router" is *usually* applied to a device which is examining > an L3 token ... a switch is usually examining a token other than an I

Establishment of Temporary Sub-IP Area

There has been some concern over the scope of the IETF sub-IP effort. This is an attempt to help clarify the view of the IESG on a number of issues. RFC 2026 defines the Internet as: "a loosely-organized international collaboration of autonomous, interconnected networks, supp

Re: What is the differents between Switch and Router?

At 12:12 19/03/2001 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: ><<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > That's my reason to use the TTL decrement; if someone shows me a device > > where a packet comes in on one interface with a certain TTL, and it comes > > out on another interface with a lower TTL but no other signi

Re: URL Resolution in printed matter

At 10:43 19/03/2001 -0500, Dan Kolis wrote: >Grretings, >Some few days ago I posted a question for an opinion, perhaps it was too >long? The question is: in the RFC framework would a specification for >barcode / machine symbols to URLS be too far afield of ietf mandates? Yes, it would be too far

Re: What is the differents between Switch and Router?

> "Garrett" == Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> That's my reason to use the TTL decrement; if someone shows me a device >> where a packet comes in on one interface with a certain TTL, and it comes >> out on another interface with a lower TTL but no other significan

Re: What is the differents between Switch and Router?

< said: > That's my reason to use the TTL decrement; if someone shows me a device > where a packet comes in on one interface with a certain TTL, and it comes > out on another interface with a lower TTL but no other significant changes, > I call it a router. Except that I can now show you a ``

[IETF50] IPv6 non-working basestations

really^100 sorry again for spamming. I got no response from NOC guys yet. the following 3 wireless basestations are configured no to bridge ethernet-layer multicast, preventing IPv6 from working across them. please turn on ethernet-layer multicast bridging

URL Resolution in printed matter

Grretings, Some few days ago I posted a question for an opinion, perhaps it was too long? The question is: in the RFC framework would a specification for barcode / machine symbols to URLS be too far afield of ietf mandates? There are some DNS like issues, but not too many. I'm a little surprised

HIP and NAT switch time slots

Due to the conflict between interest in the MULTI6 and HIP sessions, HIP and NAT have switch time slots. So now NAT is at 1415 hours in Salon G and HIP is at 1545 hours also in Salon G Hope this works for more people than the other arrangement

RE: What is the differents between Switch and Router?

< said: > note: I have not yet found anything that allows me to tell the difference > between a switch and something that is not a switch. That is one reason why > I prefer to avoid the term. Hmmm. I always thought that the definition of ``switch'' in a packet context was fairly well-understo

Re: Autoreply from Internet Draft Submission Manager

Monday, March 19, 2001, 11:21:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Internet Draft Submission Manager) wrote: IDSM> Greetings, IDSM> We are sorry, but the cut-off for Internet-Draft submissions was Friday, IDSM> March 2, 2000 at 5pm ET. Your submission will not be retained (i.e. you IDSM> need to resubmit)