RE: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread Rob Butlin
only 16 guns? why the dreadnoughts and battlecruisers of her majestys royal navy had 18 guns. Of course there at the bottom of the northsea near jutland with the other half of the grand fleet and German navy but lets not split hairs.. Rob Butlin, Senior Network Engineer Data Network

Re: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread Leslie Daigle
Please tell me this is some joke about STD=standard that I'm simply not getting... Leslie. Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote: On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Peter Deutsch wrote: Errr, actually carriers don't have 16 guns, the battleships did. There Arizona had (has?) 14 ones. At least, when I

RE: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread David Aronson
Peter Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, I'm surprised nobody's yet raised the issue of fragmenting the payload in transit and the effect this will have on traffic throughput. As modeled so far, this seems to be an interesting case where if you reduce the size of the payload you

Re: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread Ben Yalow
At 05:00 PM 4/26/01 -0700, Peter Deutsch wrote: Willis, Scott L wrote: Why Waste time with calculations, It's an American Ship! Swing the 16 guns and blow the Bridge. Bush can call it routine and not apologize for it. Errr, actually carriers don't have 16 guns, the battleships did. There

Re: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread Pat Holden
Peter Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, I'm surprised nobody's yet raised the issue of fragmenting the payload in transit and the effect this will have on traffic throughput. As modeled so far, this seems to be an interesting case where if you reduce the size of the payload

Re: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread Betsy Brennan
I'm sure this is a stupid question (and I will probably get flamed for this email), but what does this have to do with the IETF? Ben Yalow wrote: At 05:00 PM 4/26/01 -0700, Peter Deutsch wrote: Willis, Scott L wrote: Why Waste time with calculations, It's an American Ship! Swing the

Re[2]: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread Gene Gaines
Betsy, I agree. Please take the off-topic nonsense off the IETF list. You are wasting my time. Gene Gaines [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sterling, Virginia USA On Friday, April 27, 2001, 5:10:59 PM, Betsy wrote: I'm sure this is a stupid question (and I will probably get flamed for this email), but

RE: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread Book, Robert
Geez, the nerve of some people :-) If I'm not mistaken, there have been all too many international efforts to advance this TORPEDO protocol. Several years ago, there were several Germans who took the lead in this field with some similar efforts from several Japanese. Eventually,

RE: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread CARDOSO Jorge Miguel
Something New - Welcome! Thank you Robert. Betsy, your question was not stupid! I also lost some time deleting Carrier Class Gateway email's. :/ j0rgeCarD0s0 :) -Original Message- From: Book, Robert To: 'Betsy Brennan'; Ben Yalow Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27-04-2001 22:09 Subject:

Re: Re[2]: Carrier Class Gateway

2001-04-27 Thread Jose Manuel Arronte Garcia
M too! M. - Original Message - From: Gene Gaines [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Betsy Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ben Yalow [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:46 P Subject: Re[2]: Carrier Class Gateway Betsy, I agree. Please take the off-topic