Actually, I was more interested in the quote rather than the IPv6. You
notice that the portion I extracted (which contained the quote) was NOT
the lead in, or summary article. It was a position taken by a person
that we know for for those who were not in attendance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
Since the RFC Editor has a draft out that will update the instructions to
RFC authors (draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-00.txt) this seems a reasonable
time to bring up a query.
Section 10 of RFC2223 reads:
10. Author's Address Section
Each RFC must have at the very end a section giving the au
I
gathered the 3 attached graphs in the following hours.
E.T.
-Original Message-From: Beard, Cory
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: lundi 25 mars 2002
21:26To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 9/11
Reports
Could someone
point me to good papers and presentations about the effec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:13:18 PST, james woodyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > In other words, I think it might help the U.S. Senate to know that they
> > won't have to wait a year for the FCC to make a "negative determination"
> > according to Section 3.(c), i.e.
