In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>This depends on your definition of "on the wire"; if you want to
>IDNs to just work, you would have to put the ASCII version into
>URIs, too. Users *do* care about URIs.
...yet another reason why IDN represents a great deal of effort
directed at solving
Keith Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb/wrote:
> second, "ASCII for the rest of our lives" is a mischaracterization.
> IDNA allows applications to accept and present IDNs in native
> form, without requiring all applications and infrastructure to
> upgrade before IDNs can be used. [...]
> users don
g'day,
Greg Skinner wrote:
. . .
> I don't feel comfortable with the notion that the work of a WG should be
> judged according to adoption of its protocols, particularly in terms of
> traffic generated. All protocols are not equal; some have limited
> utility by design, as they serve a limited c
