Good Morning Valdis
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@;vt.edu]
> Sent: 29 October 2002 15:39
> To: Sean Jones
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)
> You're close. You'd want this for multihomed servers, so a
> PTR query works
On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:48:35 GMT, Sean Jones said:
> Forgive my ignorance, but I thought email was handled by Mail eXchange (MX)
> records, thus a PTR would not be required?
Just because an MTA follows an MX to find where to send a piece of mail
doesn't mean that other things don't use PTR record
Sean Jones wrote:
I understand where I went wrong. But I doubt that any commercial enterprise would want to block access to MS servers in RL.
Well, it'd be a good way to inhibit people from sneaking Windows into
the company.
--
/===
> > The recipient list is a pretty poor way to deal with things when you
> > get mail sent to multiple lists you're on, and often the To: line ends
> > up with nothing at all. The Return-Path: is generally the surest way
> > to know which of the lists each of the messages was sent to. I've
> > trie
Perry,
Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 1:38:54 PM, you wrote:
Perry> As I use Return-Path: headers to filter my mail, this has gotten
Perry> annoying, Yes, I can indeed kludge around it, but is there a
Perry> particular reason for this being done?
Using return-path is a bit like paying attention to
Hi everyone,
Please check out http://infs.sourceforge.net for a novel INternet
FileSystem (INFS) package which appears to be ideally suited to
cell phones and other small devices or appliances. By pushing the
DNS resolution to the kernel, INFS means to achieve the following:
- eliminates socka
On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 09:10:59 EST, John Stracke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Sean Jones wrote:
> >I understand where I went wrong. But I doubt that any commercial enterprise would
>want to block access to MS servers in RL.
> Well, it'd be a good way to inhibit people from sneaking Windows into
> t
Good Afternoon again Valdis
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Valdis.Kletnieks@;vt.edu]
> Sent: 01 November 2002 13:35
> To: Sean Jones
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Palladium (TCP/MS)
> Received: from mm_w2k1.micromedical.local
> (mailgate.peakflowmeter.c
Dave Crocker wrote:
Using return-path is a bit like paying attention to what mailbox a postal
letter is dropped into.
Or perhaps what post offices it went through on the way.
--
/===\
|John Stracke |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V Guruprasad wrote:
- eliminates sockaddr_t handling in the user space, allowing
application code to become free of IPv4/IPv6 (or for that matter
raw Ethernet or ATM) dependencies;
Doesn't using a shared library for the resolver give you the same
benefit? It's in user space, but it's not in
Michael,
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 6:28:08 PM, you wrote:
Michael> http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/icann-body.htm#B170
Michael> tells the story as best I could reconstruct it. There are footnotes to
Michael> the documents I could find.
Notice that Professor Froomkin's "To his detr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be a fine place to discuss this
further, as it is (by definition) about (albeit recent) Internet history ;-)
Joe
Craig Simon wrote:
I've got a lot of information on this which I'd be happy to share and
exchange, but I still need and want more details. I'm not sure the IET
V Guruprasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please check out http://infs.sourceforge.net for a novel INternet
> FileSystem (INFS) package which appears to be ideally suited to
> cell phones and other small devices or appliances. By pushing the
> DNS resolution to the kernel, INFS means to achieve t
Wha? they go outlaw windows? Shareholders wont do non of that in realm of
lawsuits because M$ & the media done a good job at brain neutering the masses and
furthering intellectual ejemity in the schools. Damn, I taking cis-2 and they
concentrate in M$ details of operation and not on raw talent,
> Please check out http://infs.sourceforge.net for a novel INternet
> FileSystem (INFS) package which appears to be ideally suited to
> cell phones and other small devices or appliances. By pushing the
> DNS resolution to the kernel, INFS means to achieve the following:
>
> - eliminates sockaddr_t
On Fri, 01 Nov 2002 15:30:34 GMT, Sean Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > You might think about where "peakflowmeter" came from
> I cheat with Exchange 2000. I manage a number of domains, and in order to
> make my job simpler, I have all of these domains forwarded to one domain via
> my ISP
> That included concern over the possibility that NSI would go rogue.
NSI *did* go rogue. They're still levying a toll on much of the net.
What ended up becoming ICANN was originally an attempt to keep NSI in
check - too bad it's mostly turned out to be ineffective.
If there was a mistake mad
Does anyone know
what SNMP MIB or OID value I can use to know "what mac-addresses are associated
to what switch ports" on a Cisco 1900 switch.
Thanks,
PB
18 matches
Mail list logo
