> For the last several years, all I-Ds and RFCs publication announcements
> have included message/external-body attachments to provide for automated
> retrieval of the associated document. This causes very little
> distraction for those of us who prefer to use http or mailto URIs, while
> providin
On Sunday, Nov 17, 2002, at 00:34 America/Montreal, Ross Finlayson
wrote:
I thought there was consensus to try not to hold IETF meetings in the
Bay Area?
Agree, because they are over-run with local tourists and it was
impossible to get work done.
However, IETF Chair has the authority to approv
Gudmundsson writes:
> DNSEXT has completed it's review of this document and requests that
> it be advanced to Proposed standard.
Excuse me? When did that happen? The document is highly controversial.
The conclusion of the July meeting was ``Not ready to go: axfr-clarify,
too bind specific.'' There
>>San Francisco is very convenient for many people (including me) - but
>>perhaps it's just *too* convenient. Every other IETF meeting held in the
>>Bay Area in recent years has been a zoo.
>>
>>I thought there was consensus to try not to hold IETF meetings in the Bay Area?
>>
>> Ross.
I d
