On tisdag, nov 19, 2002, at 03:37 Europe/Stockholm, Peter Saint-Andre
wrote:
Admittedly the Jabber clients for MacOS are sub-optimal. Hopefully that
situation will be remedied in time for San Francisco.
Problem resolved:
(a) JabberFox works. I have no clue why it didn't the 50 times I tried
--On 19. november 2002 00:44 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently there is a party scheduled for the garden terrace wednesday
night. I can provide music for the occasion, if necessary.
that room will fit only the 200 or so working group chairs that have been
invited. the rest of us
Let me say I really like the text conferencing experiment
so far. It's pretty cool to get a chance to have an idea
of what's going on in sessions you can't split yourself
to attend.
It'd be interesting to see more people attending the
text conference; in other (non-IETF) meetings I've seen
Let me say I really like the text conferencing experiment
so far. It's pretty cool to get a chance to have an idea
of what's going on in sessions you can't split yourself
to attend.
thanks. certainly the unexpected result (for me) is that it's really
useful for the attendees --
--On 19. november 2002 00:44 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apparently there is a party scheduled for the garden terrace wednesday
night. I can provide music for the occasion, if necessary.
that room will fit only the 200 or so working group chairs that have been
invited. the
it seems that there's Windows XP laptop acting as rogue router
serving bogus 6to4 prefix (generated from IPv4 linklocal address).
please stop it, thanks.
itojun
Reckhard, Tobias writes:
The latter page says, This Internet-Draft was not published as an RFC.
Right. The BIND company is trying to get this ``clarification''
published as a ``Proposed Standard'' RFC.
These decisions are supposed to be made by working-group consensus, then
reviewed by the
what problems is it causing?
Cheers
Joe Baptista
--
Planet Communications Computing Facility
a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited
On Wed, 20 Nov 2002, Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino wrote:
it seems that there's Windows XP laptop acting as rogue router
serving bogus 6to4 prefix
Felix von Leitner writes:
I don't understand your point about axfr-clarify-01 under the What is
allowed in a zone? heading. I think you removed too much context.
Suppose there's a delegation from the heaven.af.mil zone:
heaven.af.mil SOA ...
heaven.af.mil NS ...
moon.heaven.af.mil NS
D. J. Bernstein wrote:
SNIP
(1) NS records for which the parent node is in the zone,
(2) A records that those NS records point to,
(3) records that those NS records point to, or
(4) A6 records that those NS records point to.
SNIP
What happens if the IETF adds another
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 11:10:30AM -0500, Marshall Rose allegedly wrote:
thanks. certainly the unexpected result (for me) is that it's really
useful for the attendees -- initially, i thought this was primarily
going to be a big help for folks who couldn't physically get to the meeting.
I
It's common practice for W3C to use IRC during teleconferences and
face-to-face meetings, from which minutes can be derived. The combination
works pretty well when I have been involved. Jabber seems to work better
than IRC because, on logging in to a conference a record from the
conference
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Leslie Daigle writes:
Let me say I really like the text conferencing experiment
so far. It's pretty cool to get a chance to have an idea
of what's going on in sessions you can't split yourself
to attend.
Indeed.
--Steve Bellovin,
13 matches
Mail list logo
