on 5/27/2003 8:04 PM Dean Anderson wrote:
more waffling snipped
In both of these examples, the verbiage present in the TCPA is
equally applicable to the problem of spam. Your continued waffling on
minor, irrelevant, non-contributory details and detours does not
change that.
No, it isn't,
Eric writes:
Your response to this point was, and I quote
here: Don't get email on measured rate services,
then. which is a limp way of saying that spam
costs people with these links too much money for
them to use email.
The ability to receive e-mail is not a Constitutional right. Some
Jim writes:
Add Earthlink to the list.
Thus far I've had no trouble sending e-mail to Earthlink.
If a phone company acted like some of these
ISP, we would have situtations like Verizon
blocking all incoming calls from phones in Ohio.
Don't give them any ideas.
In the future, it may become
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 01:04:04AM -0500, Eric A. Hall wrote:
on 5/27/2003 8:04 PM Dean Anderson wrote:
more waffling snipped
So now I get 4x as much spam from the IETF list as all other sources :)
Can the discussion now retire to the IRTF anti-spam list? There seems to
be a constant
Tim writes:
Can the discussion now retire to the IRTF
anti-spam list?
Does your computer have a Delete key?
