karl, we raised the question of anycast risk with SECSAC in response to your
concerns and the conclusion was that the risks had not materialized in the
operation of anycast in roots that had already deployed it.
There are lots of ways in which routing can be wedged - until we get some
form of aut
karl wrote:
> ...
> ICANN's job is not to make decisions in secret, by unknown members of
> "staff", based on unknown criteria and using unknown assumptions. ...
that sentence is punctuated incorrectly. there's a period after "decisions."
> ... so, which is what you are saying has been done, i
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, vinton g. cerf wrote:
> >I can't seem to recall during my 2 1/2 years on ICANN's board that there
> >ever was any non-trivial discussion, even in the secrecy of the Board's
> >private e-mail list or phone calls, on the matters of IP address
> >allocation or operation of the DN
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 20:42:18 EST, Dean Anderson said:
> The main criticism of the IETF/IANA/ICANN by the rest of the world seems
> to fall under the democratic constituencies issue. People outside the US
> seem to distrust the US, and feel that their voices are not being heard,
> and that they ar
> IETF is to deliver technical solutions. IANA is to deliver a registry
> service. What is ICANN up to? Except what we agree: "to guest forums" to
> help consensus there.
>
> BTW is that very different from ITU? Just that Paul Twomey's Nov 19th
> document would have resulted from a painstakingly g/
At 17:35 30/11/03, Michael H. Lambert wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Dear jfc,
As far as I can tell, you have gone only by your initials on this
thread. To help some of us weigh this discussion, could you please
identify yourself by name and affiliation?
Sorry for this. The question was
i'm going to bend my own policy a bit and reply to a role account:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (jfcm) writes:
> ... The interest is not sites nor network protection layers, but nations
> protection from what happens on or with the networks. This is in line
> with the White House document http://whitehouse
Iljitsch van Beijnum writes:
> It seems there are (or were) 450 million bicycles in China. Think about
> it: what's cheaper to mass produce, a 20 kilo steel bicycle with lots
> of intricate mechanics, or a simple 1 kilo plastic sub-laptop?
The bicycle, by far. The mechanics are not intricate, t
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I have a slightly better than handwaving indication that the current
statistics don't show the full picture. In the past 4 years we've seen
large scale always-on internet access deployment. However, this
doesn't show up in the address space usage statistics. So add
% Anycast may even have preceded the creation of ICANN - perhaps an IETF
% source or one of the root server operators can say when the first ANYCAST
% deployments were done.
Not an IETF source. In discussions on the earliest anycast
instance, there was general agreement that "M" wa
On 30-nov-03, at 4:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The "at current burn rate" assumption is far from safe though...
Oh? Have any better-than-handwaving reasons to suspect the current
allocation rate will change drastically?
I have a slightly better than handwaving indication that the current
stati
11 matches
Mail list logo
