I see that http://www.ietf.org/WG-WEB-Mail.html, which used to point
to HTML working group mailing list archives, now points instead to
the stuff on the WG charter pages, which consist mostly of
text-based FTP archives, and in may cases the links are broken.
I know that there were a lot of broken
On May 24, 2004, at 1:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, there isn't any sane way to detect inconsistent header
information
without external hints - this is the reason why there's the SPF
proposal, the
Yahoo domain-keys proposal, and Microsoft's proposal.
And MARID.
-andy
Since the Seoul plenary meetings, Harald and I have been
working on our take-away action items. We had the opportunity
to talk with the ISOC Board in mid-May. We reviewed briefly the
trajectory set in motion from the AdvComm document, and outlined the
framework that we presented in plenary in
From: Andrew Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 24, 2004, at 1:49 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, there isn't any sane way to detect inconsistent header
information
without external hints - this is the reason why there's the SPF
proposal, the
Yahoo domain-keys proposal, and
Hello,
I am currently involved in a project to create an internet-draft for a
domain/key based system allowing mail domains to be validated using rsa
keys, distributed using the DNS system, with minimal modification to
existing infrastructure. Does a specification for such a system already
exist?
From: James Denness
I am currently involved in a project to create an internet-draft for a
domain/key based system allowing mail domains to be validated using rsa
keys, distributed using the DNS system, with minimal modification to
existing infrastructure. Does a specification for such a
How many years must this stuff continue? If someone asked me, I'd
say that the people responsible for the enclosed meant to ask the
Secretariat to be unsubscribed with prejudice from all IETF mailing
lists. Then there are people who send HTML out-of-office noise.
This stuff is a tad ironic
