> If you -really- want this
> to work, you need to be able to trust what the DNS gives you.
>
>
> --bill
If (this is a BIG if):
1) this so called CAS system were implemented
2) DNS chose to use the CAS system to provide DNS server digital
certificates
3) DNS servers would sign quer
% If you are reading this, I may actually have an implementation that merits
% further review. Thanks for your inquiry.
%
% Sal
% Salvatore Mangiapane
roughly, see DNSSEC. If you just want to use the
DNS to store CERTS, yor in luck. The CERT RR is supported
in most of t
> the idea of setting up a server that everyone in the world would trust was
> suggested in RFC 1422 (IPRA), in 1993.
> It did not succeed terribly well then, and people have tended to look very
> skeptically upon ideas that require some sort of "single root" since then.
>
> What's your reason t
Sal,
the idea of setting up a server that everyone in the world would trust was
suggested in RFC 1422 (IPRA), in 1993.
It did not succeed terribly well then, and people have tended to look very
skeptically upon ideas that require some sort of "single root" since then.
What's your reason to belie
I'm new to this process.
I'm now reviewing RFC2026 and I see that I should not have referenced a "draft".
Pardon me for that mistake.
> The root of the trust could be a "Bridge" certification authority as defined
> in 1.4.4 within draft-ietf-pkix-certpathbuild-03.txt.
> Each TLD would be a "P
--On 9. juni 2004 10:00 -0400 David Lloyd-Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On this planet things are almost always set up without plans, and plans
are almost always constructed ex post facto to justify whatever happened.
not my experience.
my favourite quote on planning is "the purpose of plannin
Hello Kevin and all,
I have been researching digital signatures in the hope of finding or starting a work
to develop a scalable certificate authority
server (CAS) system based on standards such as X.509v3 from the pkix working group and
using domain names from DNS as the basis for
tree rather th
At 06:47 AM 6/11/2004, Info wrote:
Good day.
Does anyone know if there is any work going on within the IETF on E911
location services??? If there is, which working groups should we sign up to.
start here
http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/geopriv-charter.html
Check out this work ..
http://www.ie
Good day.
Does anyone know if there is any work going on within the IETF on E911
location services??? If there is, which working groups should we sign
up to.
Regards
Kelvin
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinf
Good day.
Does anyone know if there is any work going on within the IETF on E911
??? If there is, which working groups should we sign up to.
Regards
Kelvin
--
MS Planners (Meet & Standardization Planners)
MS Planners (Meet &
Standardization Planners)
Kelvin
Steeden, Senior Partn
Hello ,
Please can you tell if there has been any commercial use of TRIP
anywhere in the world .
Also I feel there are still following issues:
1. Is there standard defined for query from the MGC to the LS?
2. TGREP is it Standardised or still in draft
3. What can be an alternate to TGREP ?
Please
11 matches
Mail list logo
