Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

2004-07-31 Thread JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
What about an information draft reporting on the results of the work of an existing organization or project? Can it use the name of the organization and only quote as authors the actual writers? where/holw should the organization be introduced? Is there any difference if the draft is not for in

Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

2004-07-31 Thread Sal Mangiapane
PS. Can someone tell me which RFC says that a draft must include a security part?. thank you; RFC2223 section 9 Sal ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

2004-07-31 Thread JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
At 13:03 31/07/2004, Sal Mangiapane wrote: PS. Can someone tell me which RFC says that a draft must include a security part?. thank you; RFC2223 section 9 Sal Thank you. I was also looking for an RFC - if any -which documents why. To know what would be the proper process to introduce a comparable

Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

2004-07-31 Thread Sal Mangiapane
Thank you. I was also looking for an RFC - if any -which documents why. There is RFC3552 which is the Security Considerations Best Practices but it doesn't answer the WHY question. Sal ___ Ietf mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www1.ietf.org/mailm

Re: Naming convention for a WG I-D that returns to

2004-07-31 Thread Harald Tveit Alvestrand
--On 31. juli 2004 11:19 +0200 "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What about an information draft reporting on the results of the work of an existing organization or project? Can it use the name of the organization and only quote as authors the actual writers? that would require gi