Worrisome side effect:
I can now only read the mail as long as the sender's mail server remains
online.
If the evaluation happens at read-time, not at fetch-time, this also means
that if I use file-and-forget, as I do with many mailing lists, and
return to my archive a year later, many of the
test [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Aronson, !
(BTW, those two characters before the ! just show up as empty boxes
here.)
This new tech is compatible with the other anti-spam techniques
I would certainly hope so. Otherwise it would be worse than useless.
The last parameter is \spam\.It
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 07:18:57PM +0800, test wrote:
The advantages of the new technique: 1.As a receiver,you first
judges the useful of the email by simple
information(email-pointer:subject,from,to and etc).if is,you can
refuse it to forbid download the body of the email(reducing the
Internet
In further review of the draft administrative restructuring plan that
was originally put together as part of the scenario O proposal sent
to this list, and subsequently republished as its own Internet-Draft
last week, a couple of significant issues have been brought to light.
1/ It wasn't clear
