Someone made the comment that there may be people who (like me) read the
IETF list more often than they read the IETF-announce list - here's a copy
of the call for consensus, just to make sure you've all seen it...
Harald
-- Forwarded Message --
Date: tirsdag,
Harald,
I think the consensus you have asserted is indeed the rough
consensus of those who have spoken up.
I would make three observations:
1. We are attempting to change part of the IETF's social
contract here. I'm glad to see the IAB and IESG showing
leadership, but it is unusually important to
Brian,
thanks for your comments!
--On torsdag, oktober 28, 2004 11:21:12 +0200 Brian E Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Harald,
I think the consensus you have asserted is indeed the rough
consensus of those who have spoken up.
I would make three observations:
1. We are attempting to change
Hi all,
Can Any one point out some advantages of SIP, that why
we need SIP in application like Video Conferencing,
which we can't get without it. Though some of them I
think are,
1. To make a consensus between the the user of
application/system, over the characteristic of media
to be used in
At 09:57 28/10/2004, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Someone made the comment that there may be people who (like me) read the
IETF list more often than they read the IETF-announce list - here's a copy
of the call for consensus, just to make sure you've all seen it...
Dear Harald,
the work you
For the documents that are to become RFCs, I most heartily agree.
Keeping the community informed of what we are doing in detail is slightly
different - this is not developing a document, it's keeping our notebook in
a public place.
I agree with Harald that keeping the notebook in a public
I agree with Scott.
John
Original message
Subject:Re: Call for Consensus: IETF Administrative Restructuring
Author: (scott bradner) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 28th October 2004 9:41:17 AM
For the documents that are to become RFCs, I most
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:52:26 +0800, =?gb2312?B?dGVzdA==?= said:
3.The authority database guarantee all \Email-content servers\ are related with
legal ESPs.
This is somewhere between highly unlikely and totally unworkable.
Problems:
1) Who controls the authority database? Why should I trust
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:40:39 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand said:
I do sympathize somewhat with the people who just want someone to take
care of this and choose not to comment in detail on the document - we have
to make sure they know what's going on, but we cannot force anyone to
actively
I think this discussion shoulg probably move to the Anti Spam Research Group
list No?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Tom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 1:14 PM
To: test
Just to be clear:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
2. I would like to see us stick as closely as possible to the
letter and spirit of RFC 2026, even if we don't have process
rules that cover exactly what we are doing. Specifically,
I'd like to see normal usage of the I-D mechanism for developing
11 matches
Mail list logo
