I regret to say the tour of the U.S. Capitol scheduled for
Thursday morning, Nov. 11 is CANCELLED.
I have been able to add a second tour for Friday morning.
Those scheduled for the Thursday tour will have first priority
for the Friday morning tour.
Sorry for such short notice. The congressional
We have a possible requirement to implement a VOSIP environment.
I understand SVOIP and of course VOIP as well as SIP...but when people talk
about VOSIP - does this relate to the SIPRNET or an implementation of
SIP...
any and all info would be helpful.
Thanks,
Marlene
Marlene Lopez
CS Engineer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Begin forwarded message:
From: Ben Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: November 10, 2004 12:07:08 PM EST
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPv6
Reply-To: Ben Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Folks,
To expand on Jeff's explanation of the IPv6 status here at
So somebody needs to get Airespace's marketroids to slow down a little
bit:
http://www.airespace.com/news/press_releases/04_1026b.php
--Mat
P.S. Sincere thanks to the IETF61 NOC for making these efforts to get
IPv6 functional on the entire network - I'll try that new config now
from Lincoln.
Ironic given the recent press announcements by Airespace, which seemed
to have jumped the gun a little ;)
First fully IPv6-compatible WLAN kit available
- October 27, 2004, 11:40 BST
- Airespace has become the first WLAN OEM to announce support for the IPv6
protocol in its products
-
Agree, good job. Is working for me since over 10 minutes ago.
BUT the routing to Europe is really stupid and absolutely unacceptable:
Ordenador-de-Jordi-Palet:/Users/Jordi/Desktop jordi$ traceroute6
www.euro6ix.org
traceroute6 to www.euro6ix.org (2001:800:40:2a03::3) from
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:18:31PM -0500, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Agree, good job. Is working for me since over 10 minutes ago.
Not for me. But interestingly, I've never been able to get an IPv4
address (or any responses) to DHCP queries from dhcpcd-1.3.22_p4 on
Linux on the v4 network.
On Nov 10 2004, at 14:18 Uhr, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
By the way, the press should take note about Airespace marketing versus
reality. I hope this company can be honest an make a public correction
on
that, otherwise customers should not trust them anymore.
Oh, come on, give them some slack.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:18:31PM -0500, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Agree, good job. Is working for me since over 10 minutes ago.
Now v6 works for me as well. I think perhaps my initial RS was ignored
for some reason, but I received a later RA. Not sure.
Anyway, I now have working v6 as well,
I am in International E, without v6 on WLAN, but can v4 ssh home and
trace from there to the v6 router here. Then I see VERY good response
over the JANET-GEANT-Abilene-IETF route.
Maybe it's a Euro6IX issue for you, for specific routing to that prefix
as opposed to the production prefix, if
FYI - we (Leslie and Harald) have made a projection of the overall
IETF administrative cost and meeting revenue for 2005. While the IETF
community is refining its plans for how it handles its administrative
future, the ISOC annual budgeting process is upon us. We needed to
provide some input
This is probably already inappropriate to the IETF list, but to be
fair to the admin folks...
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
BUT the routing to Europe is really stupid and absolutely unacceptable:
[...]
Ordenador-de-Jordi-Palet:/Users/Jordi/Desktop jordi$ traceroute6
Sorry to send this back to this list. But if people are having problems,
I would encourage them (as well as yourself) to come to the NOC (at any
IETF, this one or any future IETF). That way we can ask questions like
What is your MAC address and offer a solution as quick as possible.
In any
Hi all,
I'm not sure where to bring this information and any help would be most appreciated.
I have noticed that yahoo mail is using SMTP and not ESMTP. This is quite an issue in bandwidth saving as now the size limit for mail on yahoo is 10MB if I'm not mistaken. In many places in the world
Should ISP's increase the minimum acceptable attachment size to 10M?
If anything this will burden the Internet even more.
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Brett,
May be is even easier to setup a [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Just a suggestion, some of us get really crazy during this week to have
additional time for going physically into the NOC.
Regards,
Jordi
De: Brett Thorson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Responder a: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fecha: Wed, 10 Nov
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:32:39PM -0500, Brett Thorson wrote:
Sorry to send this back to this list. But if people are having problems,
I would encourage them (as well as yourself) to come to the NOC (at any
IETF, this one or any future IETF). That way we can ask questions like
What is your
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
But on mobility, I think we blew it.
Not sure if you are referring to the mobile IP technology in
particular, but because I suspect that the following is a bit of a
secret to the larger community, mobile IPv4 is actually deployed and
used. And end users mostly
mostly-PDF versions of presentations have been uploaded to the following
URL:
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/nov2004-washington/
Enjoy!
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On October 26, the IESG and IAB sent out a call for consensus to the IETF on
administrative restructuring, referencing the Internet-Draft:
- IAB and IESG Recommendation for IETF Administrative Restructuring
draft-iab-iesg-adminrest-rec-00.txt
Based on the feedback on this Call for Consensus,
The Policy Framework (policy) WG in the Operations and Management Area has
concluded.
The IESG contact persons are Bert Wijnen and David Kessens.
The mailing list will remain active.
___
IETF-Announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
21 matches
Mail list logo
