Bert asked:
It appears (to me) that IRTF RGs are meeting before and after IETF
meetings increasingly more often. Is there additional cost to this?
related question - do people need to register for the IETF meeting to
attend the IRTF RG meetings?
Scott
In many situations around the world in developing countries, it is
totally impossible to send a 10MB e-mail because the link will be at
least break once in the time it takes to send 10MB. As e-mail does not
resume...
FWIW, RFC 1845 specifies such a mechanism for SMTP. There have been
few
Margarets draft-wasserman-iasa-bcp-01.txt states (bottom of page 7):
There will also be two non-voting, ex officio liaisons:
o The IAB Chair
o The IETF Administrative Director
[Note: There is some question about whether the IAB Chair should be a
liaison or a full member
My sense is that an IAB chair is probably very well informed and will have
very good insight into all the issues surrounding the IASA. Therefore it
makes sense to give the IAB chair a vote.
Erik
--On zaterdag 13 november 2004 16:53 +0100 Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Margarets
During the Plenary last wednesday there were suggestions/proposals to
make IAB chair a voting member.
I personally think that that makes sense.
I agree that the idea makes sense
but I think that most of the IAOC should mostly work by consensus - I
expect that any issue that only garnered a
ned freed writes:
In many situations around the world in developing countries, it is
totally impossible to send a 10MB e-mail because the link will be
at least break once in the time it takes to send 10MB. As e-mail
does not resume...
FWIW, RFC 1845 specifies such a mechanism for SMTP. There
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Franck == Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Franck In many situations around the world in developing countries,
Franck it is totally impossible to send a 10MB e-mail because the
Franck link will be at least break once in the time it takes to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Harald == Harald Tveit Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Harald If there is one support structure with responsibility for
Harald both, it makes much more sense to pay for the rooms out of
Harald the meeting budget (probably getting a better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
If the IAB chair and IETF chair (who is also the IESG chair) are
both members IASA (whether voting or not), I am wondering about the
people appointed by the IESG and IAB.
Why do it this way? Why not just have nomcom fill all slots?
Section 3 could explain
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 18:11 +0100, Simon Leinen wrote:
There are still many countries which only connection to the
Internet is a 64kb/s and quite a lot which speed is below 512kb/s
Developed countries and the IETF need to cater for these emerging
nations to avoid the digital divide.
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 11:00 -0500, Michael Richardson wrote:
Franck I think as yahoo being a major e-mail provider it would be
Franck good, that they become more responsible (they are actively
Franck fighting SPAM) and use ESMTP when sending their e-mails. It
Franck seems
Erik == Erik Huizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Erik My sense is that an IAB chair is probably very well informed
Erik and will have very good insight into all the issues
Erik surrounding the IASA. Therefore it makes sense to give the
Erik IAB chair a vote.
The reason it would not
I too think the IAB Chair should vote. But that raises an issue...
While I agree that consensus should be the normal operation mode, I think
this body can't live with let's wait until later and hope we know more
then as the normal means of resolving close-call conflicts. The budget
proposals
--On 13. november 2004 16:31 -0500 Michael Richardson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the IAB chair and IETF chair (who is also the IESG chair) are
both members IASA (whether voting or not), I am wondering about the
people appointed by the IESG and IAB.
Why do it this way? Why not just have nomcom
14 matches
Mail list logo
