Me too
Brian
Scott Bradner wrote:
I can go with what Harald suggests:
Scott
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 23:11:21 +0100
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Consensus? Separate bank account
After all this threading, it seems clear that it would be bad
At the moment, the best "overall" site is
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/adminrest/ - the timeline has pointers to
most of the important documents, I think.
Harald
--On onsdag, desember 08, 2004 14:02:16 -0800 "Randy.Dunlap"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote
--On onsdag, desember 08, 2004 11:44:01 -0500 Margaret Wasserman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually, I think that the IAOC should post all correspondence, and I
don't think that this is an onerous requirement. It is not likely that
there will be all that much non-electronic communication, such
At 07:53 AM 12/09/04 +0100, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Do we need to make a global pass of s/account/accounts/?
I think so.
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Since I have seen quite a few agreement postings to below
posting of Harald, I have made the change as suggested by Harald
(in my working copy that is).
Bert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand
> Sent: Wednesday, Dec
>
> At 07:53 AM 12/09/04 +0100, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
> >Do we need to make a global pass of s/account/accounts/?
>
> I think so.
>
Done in my working copy
Bert
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/
Brian's response seems reasonable to me.
John
--- Original message ---
Subject: Re: Transparency/Openness of the IAOC
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Time: 12/08/2004 3:53 pm
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> In reviewing the IASA BCP draft
Section 5.1
"For bookkeeping purposes, funds managed by IASA should be accounted for
in a separate set of accounts which can be rolled-up periodically to the
equivalent of a balance sheet and a profit and loss statement for IASA
alone after taking into account the effect of common items paid for o
Section 5.4
" Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified in
Section 6IASA Budget Process. ISOC shall credit the appropriate IASA
accounts at least quarterly.
If ISOC pays any other IETF expenses directly, without transferring funds
to the IASA, this shall be documented a
Section 3
"The IAOC is accountable for the structure of the IASA and thus decides
which functions are to be outsourced. All outsourcing must be via
well-defined contracts or equivalent instruments. If any functions are
performed in-house, they must be clearly specified and documented with
well-def
Section 3.1
As has been stated by others, I think we want the IAOC to be able to
rewrite the IAD's job description if and when circumstances warrant it.
So I think we need to be clear about what are essential IAD duties
prescribed by this document (which require another BCP to change) and what
el
The IASA, AdminRest et al discussions appear to be proceeding well, but
perhaps it might make sense to craft a mailing list specifically for those
discussions ? Its possible the recent (last 2 week) upswing in the number
of related posts to the ietf mailing list will die down shortly, but my
g
On Dec 9, 2004, at 8:41 AM, Michael StJohns wrote:
The IASA, AdminRest et al discussions appear to be proceeding well,
but perhaps it might make sense to craft a mailing list specifically
for those discussions ?
I would like to second this suggestion.
Its possible the recent (last 2 week) upswi
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 11:41:24 EST, Michael StJohns said:
> The IASA, AdminRest et al discussions appear to be proceeding well, but
> perhaps it might make sense to craft a mailing list specifically for those
> discussions ?
On the one hand, part of me says "Amen, this stuff makes my brain hurt".
Well, the choice to put this on the ietf-discuss list was deliberate:
including making sure that a reasonable cross section of the IETF
would see the discussion. It's not at all clear that such a cross
section would bother to subscribe to a new mailing list (and a new
mailing list often just attra
If I had confidence that the people discussing this in small groups were
certain to distinguish between "direction" issues (should be discussed on
the IETF list, because it affects too many people) and "wording" issues
(may be discussed in a smaller group, because not that many people care), I
FWIW, it seems likely that at least some commercial contracts (for
hotels, etc.) will get negotiated on paper or by fax, and so an "all
paper correspondence" approach could be problematic. Certainly as an
attorney there have been times that I have chosen to negotiate only
in hardcopy (making i
17 matches
Mail list logo
