John C Klensin wrote:
--On Thursday, 30 December, 2004 11:21 -0800 EKR ekr@rtfm.com
wrote:
Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I admit that I maybe have too much a view point of someone
working for a relatively large company. I try to approach
this from a position where
Jonne,
Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki) wrote:
Hi,
sorry to tune in late, but keeping up with all the mails that are going
around I needed a vacation at the place of my in-laws...
I think the issue of a yearly audit has been solved already in the past
(Issue 721). However, I think that there is
John C Klensin wrote:
--On Sunday, 26 December, 2004 08:35 -0500 Margaret Wasserman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd remove everything after the comma. There is no
clear concept of what duties and responsibilities would
normally be associated with such a position, and you
have specific
On 2-jan-05, at 3:20, Glen Zorn ((gwz)) wrote:
Of course, the MAXIMUM temperatures quoted in the *exceptional* Paris
summer of 2003 were 104 degrees Fahrenheit;
2003 was, indeed, exceptional. OTOH, it is hardly exceptional that
everyone who can leave the city in August, does. This is no doubt
brian asks
Perhaps we do indeed need to explicitly limit the
IAOC Chair to chairing the IAOC. But we almost do - the following paragraph
says:
The chair of the IAOC shall have the authority to manage the
activities and meetings of the IAOC. The IAOC Chair has no formal
duty
At 11:37 AM +0100 1/2/05, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
The chair of the IAOC shall have the authority to manage the
activities and meetings of the IAOC. The IAOC Chair has no formal
duty to represent the IAOC, except as directed by IAOC consensus.
Isn't this enough?
Yes, I think so. That is
Date: 2005-01-01 21:20
From: Glen Zorn \(gwz\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I did (though I admit I see little humor is the story).
However, my main point was not so much that we would die in droves
(or at all); more to the point is the question of why we seem to go
out of our way to find
--On Sunday, 02 January, 2005 08:19 -0500 Scott Bradner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
brian asks
Perhaps we do indeed need to explicitly limit the
IAOC Chair to chairing the IAOC. But we almost do - the
following paragraph says:
The chair of the IAOC shall have the authority to manage
This is a bizaare thread. As someone who has been Paris a dozen times
and several of those visits in the
august, this is one of the best cities in the world to visit. I
highly recommend extending your stay around the meeting to enjoy the
many tourist attractions. Great food, great musueums,
Date: 2005-01-01 21:27
From: Peter Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ietf@ietf.org
Separating the specification
of language via a field from registration procedure was entirely
appropriate, as BCP documents are used for procedures and policies
and not for technical
Iljitsch van Beijnum mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] supposedly
scribbled:
On 2-jan-05, at 3:20, Glen Zorn ((gwz)) wrote:
Of course, the MAXIMUM temperatures quoted in the *exceptional*
Paris summer of 2003 were 104 degrees Fahrenheit;
2003 was, indeed, exceptional. OTOH, it is hardly
Date: 2005-01-01 21:58
From: Peter Constable [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ietf@ietf.org
2. RFC 3066 did not require every possible combination of language
subtag + country subtag to be registered.
None *could* be registered.
Even if by some oversight or lapse of
I will be out of the office starting 24/12/2004 and will not return until
10/01/2005.
A very Merry Christmas and a dashing Happy New Year to you and all your
loved ones!!
I'll trystay in the loop, but no promises on my behalf ...;-)
Until next year,
@+ manu
This is indeed a bizarre thread..
As a near neighbour (UK), I can tell you that 2003 was indeed exceptional
across most of Europe. My home area north east of London was reduced to a
desert by the end of August, and there were some accelerated deaths due to
heat exhaustion.
Things reverted to
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:33:37AM -0800, Glen Zorn (gwz) wrote:
BTW, how much worse are the Minneapolis temperatures in march vs
those in november?
Let's not go there: for some reason the powers-that-be have decided
that it's a great idea to gather at least once if not twice a year
in a
Hi Bruce,
Even if by some oversight or lapse of judgment the tag
en-US were to be registered, its interpretation by a
parser would be as an ISO 639 language code followed by
an ISO 3166 country code. SUch a registration would
therefore be pointless. In practice, therfore, it
simply
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Behalf Of Theodore Ts'o
| Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:20 AM
| To: Glen Zorn (gwz)
| Cc: 'Iljitsch van Beijnum'; 'IETF Discussion'
| Subject: Re: Excellent choice for summer meeting location!
|
| Shrug
Bruce Lilly supposedly scribbled:
Date: 2005-01-01 21:20
From: Glen Zorn \(gwz\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I did (though I admit I see little humor is the story).
However, my main point was not so much that we would die in droves
(or at all); more to the point is the question of why we
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ietf-languages-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Lilly
Ah, but RFC 3066 does not sanction use of tags like sr-CS-Latn without
registration, and no such tags are registered.
Precisely; an RFC 1766/3066 parser, based on the 1766 and
3066 specifications,
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ietf-languages-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Lilly
There is nothing in RFC 3066 that says a registered tag must have 3 to 8
characters in the second subtag. It simply requires that any tag in which
the second subtag is 3 to 8 letters must be
20 matches
Mail list logo
