John/Leslie et al - this is a good improvement, and Leslie's 3.5 now reads
in a way I can support. 3.6 still has some sticking points.
After the last round of comments I went away and thought and came up with
the following:
There are three separate things that I think were meant by the origina
I'm still concerned with not having the ability to sublicense rights
we have under this section.
The last time I discussed this issue Harald pointed out that I was
asking for more rights than we had under 3667.
However I have sense been convinced that 3667 is broken.
--On Friday, 21 January, 2005 08:45 -0500 Scott Bradner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> how about (in response to Elwyn's comment)
>
>Although the IAD is an ISOC employee, he or she works under
> thedirection of the IAOC. A committee of the IAOC is
> responsible forhiring and firin
--On Friday, 21 January, 2005 15:45 +0100 Harald Tveit
Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 7 (Transparency): While I understand the desire for
> transparency, there may be some contracts that contain items
> that are justifiably
> treated as confidential (such as individual performance
> re
--On Friday, 21 January, 2005 15:42 +0100 Harald Tveit
Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From Jorge:
>
> 3. Legal Advice.
>
> (Apologies if I sound biased about this one, but)
>
> Although the IAD and IASA have responsibility for negotiating
> and
> approving all contracts relatin
Hi,
The IAD is required to respond to requests for a review from the
IAOC, and the IAOC is required to respond to requests for a review
of a decision from the IAB or from the IESG.
If members of the community feel that they are unjustly denied a
response to a request for review, they may ask the IA
As part of the transition to the IETF Administrative Support Activity
(IASA), the IESG, the IAB and ISOC has formed a "transition team" to help
start the work required to establish the IASA.
The transition team is not empowered to make binding decisions about the
IASA. It tries to lay out the t
Leslie,
I think this is a huge improvement, and a large step in the
right direction. Two observations:
(i) In the revised 3.5, it would be good to get a slightly
better handle/ definition on what is, or is not, a "business
decision". Since the IAD and IAOC are ultimately all about
business deci
