I have a minor issue. Section 4 says:
The IAOC members shall not receive any compensation for their
services as members of the IAOC.
Clearly, some people are allowed to work on IETF stuff during hour paid for
by their employers. Thus, they are compensated. We need to be more clear
here.,
> Date: 2005-01-27 14:43
> From: The IESG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: IETF-Announce
>
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the
> following document:
>
> - 'Message Submission '
> Â Â as a Draft Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next f
> "JFC" == JFC (Jefsey) Morfin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JFC> 2. ISOC is an international organization, yet there is no
JFC> indication about relations with ISOC local chapters. For
JFC> organizing local IETF lists, assisting with IETF meetings,
JFC> documenting specific loca
--On lørdag, januar 29, 2005 11:47:00 +0200 Kai Henningsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was the fraction "2/3" that Russ objected to in the first place,
pointing out that this means 6 out of 8 if everyone's present - which he
thought was too much of a required majority.
Which just points to a l
Harald asks:
> is using
> the term "5/8 of the voting members" an acceptable phrase?
it's just what I was asking for (i.e, to answer your question - yes)
Scott
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Sunday, January 30, 2005 21:42:32 +0100 Harald Tveit Alvestrand
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On lørdag, januar 29, 2005 11:47:00 +0200 Kai Henningsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It was the fraction "2/3" that Russ objected to in the first place,
pointing out that this means 6 out of 8 if every
