Re: email document delivery service

2005-02-04 Thread John C Klensin
--On Thursday, February 03, 2005 7:57 PM -0500 stanislav shalunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Internet-draft announcements, as they are currently generated, include a MIME-based mechanism to request internet-drafts via email. Do you use this feature? If you do, could you please let me know?

Re: Something to look forward to at the meeting

2005-02-04 Thread Rob Evans
Maybe the story that URL points to is not the one you intended, or I am missing something here, or misinterpreting. In which case I apologise in advance. http://www.startribune.com/stories/368/5217727.html So the trains have to slow down for a minute or two. Your point is? Why has it become

Implementations of RFC 3460 or 3060

2005-02-04 Thread Choudhary, Rahim \(Contr\)
I want to try out in the lab some implementations (products or lab/research versions) of Policy Framework as in RFC 3460 or 3060. However I can not find any such implementations. If you are aware of some, I will appreciate any information or pointers. There is PONDER tool for policy

Re: email document delivery service

2005-02-04 Thread ned . freed
Hi, Our anti-virus system tags all IETF draft announcements as being potentially dangerous. I suspect because of the unusual options to fetch the data that are encoded in the MIME header. We would certainly like to see that feature removed from IETF announcements, as it seems archaic.

Re: email document delivery service

2005-02-04 Thread Tony Hansen
John C Klensin wrote: --On Friday, February 04, 2005 8:41 AM + Tim Chown wrote: Our anti-virus system tags all IETF draft announcements as being potentially dangerous. I suspect because of the unusual options to fetch the data that are encoded in the MIME header. Hmm. There is a case to be

Re: email document delivery service

2005-02-04 Thread Bill Fenner
[tangent alert!] On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 13:43:56 -0500, Tony Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even more fearful, I have a feeling that they were just following instructions provided by the firewall software people, who SHOULD know better. Heh. You're giving quite a bit of credit to a class of

Re: 1918bis

2005-02-04 Thread Sam Hartman
Tony == Tony Hain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tony and now the replacement ULA space is unable to be published Tony as it is dragging out in an interminable discuss state. I see no discusses on draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr. I have not been following the document though since I

Internet-Draft Submission Cutoff Dates for the 62nd IETF Meeting in Minneapolis, MN

2005-02-04 Thread ietf-secretariat
There are two (2) Internet-Draft cutoff dates for the 62nd IETF Meeting in Minneapolis, MN: February 14th: Cutoff Date for Initial (i.e., -00) Internet-Draft Submissions All initial Internet-Drafts (-00) must be submitted by Monday, February 14th at 9:00 AM ET. As always, all initial

62nd IETF - Overflow Hotels

2005-02-04 Thread IETF Agenda
We have a group rate at the following hotels for the 62nd IETF Meeting: Marquette Hotel Minneapolis Doubletree Information on these hotels can be obtained on our website at: http://www.ietf.org/meetings/hotels_62.html Doubletree Guest Suites Minneapolis 1101 LaSalle Avenue Minneapolis, MN

RFC 3984 on RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video

2005-02-04 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 3984 Title: RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video Author(s): S. Wenger, M.M. Hannuksela, T. Stockhammer, M. Westerlund, D. Singer Status: Standards Track