It would seem my Internet-Draft is somewhat poorly researched and immature;
moreover, my proposal has already been established, comprehensively, by others
(msgtrk charter: RFCs 3885-3888).
It is therefore my decision, if this is at all possible, to have
draft-harrison-email-tracking-00.txt
Hi,
Is it valid to include the SDP in a non reliable 183 sent in response to
an Invite with no initial offer?
It is ok to include the SDP in the 183 when the Invite contains the
initial offer, but RFC 3261 is not clear as to whether the SDP can be
included when no offer is included in the
Leslie,
Where in the body of the document does it say that the IAOC is independent
of ISOC. This could have been clarified but was not. I believe it needs to
be explicit.
bob
At 01:10 PM 2/14/2005, Leslie Daigle wrote:
Bob,
My point was that the abstract text should not be at odds with
the body
At 12:32 PM + 2/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is therefore my decision, if this is at all possible, to have
draft-harrison-email-tracking-00.txt stricken from the record...
That's not possible in the IETF. In fact, many people often argue
that Internet Drafts should live much longer than
Chris Harrison wrote:
*
* It would seem my Internet-Draft is somewhat poorly researched and immature;
* moreover, my proposal has already been established, comprehensively, by
others
* (msgtrk charter: RFCs 3885-3888).
*
This gentleman apparently does not understand that the
--On mandag, februar 14, 2005 10:52:17 -0800 Paul Hoffman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:32 PM + 2/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is therefore my decision, if this is at all possible, to have
draft-harrison-email-tracking-00.txt stricken from the record...
That's not possible in the
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 4003
Title: GMPLS Signaling Procedure for Egress Control
Author(s): L. Berger
Status: Standards Track
Date: February 2005
Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 3961
Title: Encryption and Checksum Specifications
for Kerberos 5
Author(s): K. Raeburn
Status: Standards Track
Date: February 2005
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 3962
Title: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) Encryption for
Kerberos 5
Author(s): K. Raeburn
Status: Standards Track
Date: February 2005
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 3990
Title: Configuration and Provisioning for Wireless Access
Points (CAPWAP) Problem Statement
Author(s): B. O'Hara, P. Calhoun, J. Kempf
Status:
10 matches
Mail list logo
