Re: MARID back from the grave?

2005-03-01 Thread Dave Singer
At 10:14 PM -0500 2/26/05, Keith Moore wrote: Thanks. I forgot to say on (c) that there MUST be as many entries in the revision history as the revision number indicates (i.e. none for revision 00, and so on). don't do that. it will add an unnecessary and often useless barrier to publication

Re: MARID back from the grave?

2005-03-01 Thread Keith Moore
I think I overstated what I was looking for. I often see requests like I saw -03, this is -05, what as -04 and what has changed? on the mailing lists. I was just thinking that a section like this would help (names are just examples) Change history: draft-ietf-dxs-odorimeter-0525-jun-2007

Re: MARID back from the grave?

2005-03-01 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: --On lørdag, februar 26, 2005 21:22:36 -0800 Christian Huitema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In fact, we only have two points of contentions: old personal drafts submitted as version 00 of WG drafts; and old WG drafts submitted as version 00 of new personal drafts.

Re: MARID back from the grave?

2005-03-01 Thread Dave Singer
At 10:34 PM +0100 3/1/05, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: --On lørdag, februar 26, 2005 21:22:36 -0800 Christian Huitema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In fact, we only have two points of contentions: old personal drafts submitted as version 00 of WG drafts; and old WG drafts

Re: Please review updated 1id-guidelines

2005-03-01 Thread Bruce Lilly
Date: 2005-02-19 19:02 From: Bill Fenner fenner@research.att.com I'm working on an update for 1id-guidelines.txt so that it will be ready to reflect the new IPR RFCs (RFC 3907 and 3908) when they are published. It's gone through one round of discussion in the IESG; now I'm looking for

Re: MARID back from the grave?

2005-03-01 Thread Harald Tveit Alvestrand
--On tirsdag, mars 01, 2005 22:34:08 +0100 Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: now that we know that the secretariat keeps track of drafts that claim to obsolete another draft, we could make this Real Simple: drafts that say they obsolete another draft get the later deadline.

BCP 100, RFC 4020 on Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points

2005-03-01 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 100 RFC 4020 Title: Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Code Points Author(s): K. Kompella, A. Zinin Status: Best Current Practice Date:

RFC 4013 on SASLprep: Stringprep Profile for User Names and Passwords

2005-03-01 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4013 Title: SASLprep: Stringprep Profile for User Names and Passwords Author(s): K. Zeilenga Status: Standards Track Date: February 2005

BCP 78, RFC 3978 on IETF Rights in Contributions

2005-03-01 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 78 RFC 3978 Title: IETF Rights in Contributions Author(s): S. Bradner, Ed. Status: Best Current Practice Date: March 2005 Mailbox:[EMAIL

BCP 79, RFC 3979 on Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology

2005-03-01 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 79 RFC 3979 Title: Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology Author(s): S. Bradner, Ed. Status: Best Current Practice Date: March 2005 Mailbox: