At 10:14 PM -0500 2/26/05, Keith Moore wrote:
Thanks. I forgot to say on (c) that there MUST
be as many entries in the revision history as the
revision number indicates (i.e. none for revision
00, and so on).
don't do that. it will add an unnecessary and often useless barrier to
publication
I think I overstated what I was looking for. I often see requests
like I saw -03, this is -05, what as -04 and what has changed? on
the mailing lists. I was just thinking that a section like this would
help (names are just examples)
Change history:
draft-ietf-dxs-odorimeter-0525-jun-2007
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On lørdag, februar 26, 2005 21:22:36 -0800 Christian Huitema
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, we only have two points of contentions: old personal drafts
submitted as version 00 of WG drafts; and old WG drafts submitted as
version 00 of new personal drafts.
At 10:34 PM +0100 3/1/05, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On lørdag, februar 26, 2005 21:22:36 -0800
Christian Huitema
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, we only have two points of contentions: old personal drafts
submitted as version 00 of WG drafts; and old WG drafts
Date: 2005-02-19 19:02
From: Bill Fenner fenner@research.att.com
I'm working on an update for 1id-guidelines.txt so that it
will be ready to reflect the new IPR RFCs (RFC 3907 and 3908)
when they are published. It's gone through one round of
discussion in the IESG; now I'm looking for
--On tirsdag, mars 01, 2005 22:34:08 +0100 Brian E Carpenter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
now that we know that the secretariat keeps track of drafts that claim
to obsolete another draft, we could make this Real Simple:
drafts that say they obsolete another draft get the later deadline.
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
BCP 100
RFC 4020
Title: Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track
Code Points
Author(s): K. Kompella, A. Zinin
Status: Best Current Practice
Date:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 4013
Title: SASLprep: Stringprep Profile for User Names and
Passwords
Author(s): K. Zeilenga
Status: Standards Track
Date: February 2005
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
BCP 78
RFC 3978
Title: IETF Rights in Contributions
Author(s): S. Bradner, Ed.
Status: Best Current Practice
Date: March 2005
Mailbox:[EMAIL
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
BCP 79
RFC 3979
Title: Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology
Author(s): S. Bradner, Ed.
Status: Best Current Practice
Date: March 2005
Mailbox:
10 matches
Mail list logo