Re: Last Call: 'Email Submission Between Independent Networks' to BCP

Dave == Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dave Sam, First, in section 5, please do not list cram-md5 as a secure authentication technology. Today I think we'd require a security layer from a SASL mechanism to consider it secure. Also cram-md5 suffers from other

BCP 86, RFC 4086 on Randomness Requirements for Security

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 106 RFC 4086 Title: Randomness Requirements for Security Author(s): D. Eastlake, 3rd, J. Schiller, S. Crocker Status: Best Current Practice Date: June 2005

RFC 4103 on RTP Payload for Text Conversation

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4103 Title: RTP Payload for Text Conversation Author(s): G. Hellstrom, P. Jones Status: Standards Track Date: June 2005 Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL

RFC 4098 on Terminology for Benchmarking BGP Device Convergence in the Control Plane

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4098 Title: Terminology for Benchmarking BGP Device Convergence in the Control Plane Author(s): H. Berkowitz, E. Davies, Ed., S. Hares, P.

RFC 4087 on IP Tunnel MIB

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 4087 Title: IP Tunnel MIB Author(s): D. Thaler Status: Standards Track Date: June 2005 Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pages: 25