> "Ned" == Ned Freed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Dave, >Here's my own take:
>> >
>> >It is empty bureaucracy. It is form, without content. It is
>> additional >effort, with no benefit.
>> >
>> >It is reasonable and necessary to require that documents
>> contain
I have not been following this topic closely.
To the point of open relays being a problem.
I think that the judgment as to if open replays are a problem
or not depends on which spam lists you are on.
With my system and by grep-ing through my last 4 weeks of logs
there were 22,870 of 26,157 spam
There are several issues for the IESG:
In summary, people have brought up several reasons that this draft
shouldn't be approved. But I think these are sufficient:
1) End run around SMTP developers, as Keith Moore pointed out.
2) "spamops" past unreasonable and irrational demands and views requ
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Nicholas Staff wrote:
> Dean,
>
> I couldn't agree with you more - thanks for saying it.
You're welcome.
> whats funny to me is if anything would have given spammers a reason to
> exploit open relays it would have been the blacklists.
No, this isn't the case, and ironica
At 12:58 22/06/2005, Tom Petch wrote:
For me, this list of items misses the point of having a chair, which IMO is to
focus the discussion, the work, on the tasks in hand, so that they get
done in a
timely fashion.
A chair should start from the Charter and make sure it is well and
consensuall
--On 21. juni 2005 12:16 -0400 John Leslie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if a WG chair has posted nothing to the WG mailing list for a week, and
that WG chair has not told the WG he's on holiday, that WG chair is
probably not doing his/her job.
Much though I remain a staunch fan of Harald, I
Everybody,
Most of the mail under this subject field is of little help to
the IESG in judging whether the draft in question is ready to
become a BCP. Please ask yourself "Does my message address specific
issues in the draft?" before hitting the send button.
Thanks
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Original Message -
From: "John Loughney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:47 PM
Subject: what is a wg chair's job was: Simplistic metrics Re: WG management
> Harald,
>
> Your mail prompted me to write a mail I have be
