On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
I didn't see this message from Ken Raeburn go to the IETF list. [I just found it
on the IETF archive site, I will respond in detail shortly. Strangely, I should
have received 2 copies, one to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and one from the IETF list. I
have
At 23:47 30/09/2005, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
I have had discussions with parties who are fully aware of the
difference between ICANN and the IETF and it is clear they want to
take over both.
Dear Hallam,
the monolingual/etc. Internet is the adherence to the RFCs supported
by the IANA and
Is it not the case that if you distribute an unique namespace (rather
than use a tree for DNS) you will end up swapping a root based DNS
architecture for some form of PKI to authenticate the distributed
namespace as meeting policy and that this also needs a structure to
guarantee authentic
Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> If you allow a bunch of engineers to create their ideal working
> conditions they would allow unlimited scope for technical excellence
> with no hard deadlines and no need to ever interact with the actual
> customers.
Well said.
--
Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
Thomas Gal writes:
> Well certainly the network controls in place in china are a good
> example of this. HOWEVER I'd say really it all boild down to power.
The path to power is paved with trampled freedoms.
> YES! Not to mention the plethora of engineers and geeks who know too
> much about what'
