On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 13:51 -0600, wayne wrote:
Well, I can see coming back some day and trying to create an update to
the SPF protocol. I can't see trying to change SPF version 1.
The problem with SPF draft is there is no spf2.0/mfrom. This has little
to do the IETF, but rather a
Douglas Otis wrote:
The problem with SPF draft is there is no spf2.0/mfrom.
One week from draft-ietf-marid-mailfrom-00 to the termination
of MARID was a bit short. And after that the next draft was
again v=spf1 draft-lentczner-spf-00 (same author). Actually
an emergency draft, because the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Frank Ellermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Whatever you think, but your complaints about the theoretical
upper limit of DNS queries in an attack scenario resulted in
some of the most interesting post-MARID changes (Wayne's I-Ds).
This is bunk.
The DoS limits that are in
I have, in the past, argued to the IESG that I did not think the SPF
I-D should be marked Experimental because I did not see it being an
experiment. It has been out for 2 years now and it is far too widely
deployed to make significant changes. Instead, I thought it should be
standard track.
On Dec 13, 2005, at 11:07 AM, wayne wrote:
However, his complaints could not have possibly had any impact on
the current limits in the SPF spec.
The reduction to 111 DNS lookups is not a resounding impact with
respect to this concern. Defending this sequential lookup
requirement will
The IESG is making a call for volunteers for the IETF
Administrative Oversight Committee (IAOC), as described in
BCP 101 (RFC 4071) and the approved BCP
draft-iab-iesg-iaoc-selection-03.txt.
The IESG and the IAB each select one person for a two-year IAOC
term in alternate years. This year, the
The IESG has received a request from the Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge to Edge WG
to consider the following document:
- 'PWE3 Frame Check Sequence Retention '
draft-ietf-pwe3-fcs-retention-04.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 4119
Title: A Presence-based GEOPRIV Location Object Format
Author(s): J. Peterson
Status: Standards Track
Date: December 2005
Mailbox:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 4241
Title: A Model of IPv6/IPv4 Dual Stack Internet Access
Service
Author(s): Y. Shirasaki, S. Miyakawa, T. Yamasaki,
A. Takenouchi
Status:
